«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:

24卷

期数:

2018年05期

页码:

420-424

栏目:

临床医学

出版日期:

2018-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Impacts of intra-abdominal fat area and body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer and short surgical outcomes

作者:

吕文浩; 王 吉; 魏 颖; 李卫东

天津医科大学总医院普通外科，天津 300070

Author(s):

lv Wen-hao; WANG Ji;  WEI Ying;  LI Wei-dong

Department of General Surgery，General Hospital，Tianjin Medical University，Tianjin 300070, China

关键词:

结直肠癌; 腹腔镜; 腹腔内脏脂肪面积; 体质量指数

Keywords:

colorectal cancer; laparoscopy; intra-abdominal fat area;  body mass index

分类号:

R735.3+7

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：探讨腹腔内脂肪面积（IFA）及体质量指数（BMI）对结直肠癌病人腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术及术后短期结局的影响。方法：回顾性收集2015 年5月-2017年1月我院普通外科收治的74例腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的患者。术前计算患者BMI，并通过多层螺旋CT（MSCT）扫描测量IFA。根据BMI中国标准分为超重组（BMI＞24 kg/m2），非超重组（BMI≤23.9 kg/m2）。以IFA≥100 cm2 为区分标准，将病人分为高脂肪量组（H-IFA，IFA≥100 cm2）和低脂肪量组（L-IFA，IFA<100 cm2）。比较各组患者之间术后肠周淋巴结清扫数、术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院天数及短期术后并发症等临床参数。结果：H-IFA 组的淋巴结检出数（13.83±4.96）枚低于L-IFA组的淋巴结检出数（18.81±5.67）枚，H-IFA组的术中出血量（154.39±157.97）mL高于L-IFA组的术中出血量（80.30±68.12）mL，H-IFA组的患者年龄（68.27±8.34）岁高于L-IFA组的患者年龄（62.6±10.84岁），上述差异具有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）。超重组和非超重组于患者年龄、淋巴结检出数、术中出血量之间、手术时间无显著性差异（P＞0.05）。14例患者出现术后早期并发症，H-IFA与L-IFA组间及肥胖及非肥胖组间并发症的发生率无显著性差异（P＞0.05）。H-IFA与L-IFA中不同BMI与年龄、性别、手术之间及并发症之间的差异无统计学意义，高IFA且超重的患者住院时间（18.15±9.36）d，要长于非超重患者的住院时间（13.21±2.86）d，（P＜0.05）。结论：MSCT 测量的IFA较BMI可更精确地评估腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的手术难易程度。

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the effect of intra-abdominal fat area and body mass index on early surgical outcomes for patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Methods: Retrospectively we collected data of 74 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer from May 2015 to January 2017 in general surgery department of our hospital. According to intra-abdominal fat area (IFA) gained from MSCT, they were assigned into two groups: low intra-abdominal fat area group (L-IFA) and high- intra-abdominal fat area group (H-IFA). According to body mass index, they were separated into two groups: overweight group and non-overweight group. Parameters such as intraoperative blood loss, time of operation, postoperative hospital stay, the numbers of lymph nodes retrieved and surgical and nonsurgical complications were recorded and compared among groups. Results: According to IFA, the mean values of the numbers of lymph nodes retrieved in H-IFA group（13.83±4.96） was lower than that in L-IFA group （18.81±5.67）, intraoperative blood loss in H-IFA group [（154.39±157.97）mL]was higher than that in L-IFA group[（80.30±68.12）mL]，the ages of patients in H-IFA group（68.27±8.34） was higher than those in L-IFA group （62.6±10.84）， and those differences were significant between the two groups(P＜0.05）. According to BMI, the mean values of the numbers of lymph nodes retrieved, intraoperative blood loss, ages of patients were not significantly different among three groups(P＞0.05). No significant differences were found with regard to the early surgical complications in IFA groups and BMI groups. Combined with over-weight patients, patients with H-IFA have significantly longer hospital-stay[（18.15±9.36）d] than the rest [（13.21±2.86）d] （P＜0.05）.Conclusion: Intra-abdominal fat area measured by MS CT can better indicate the difficulty of laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer than BMI.

参考文献/References:

[1] Price G M, Uauy R, Breeze E, et al. Weight, shape, and mortality risk in older persons: elevated waist-hip ratio, not high body mass index, is associated with a greater risk of death[J]. Am J Clin Nutr,2006, 84（2）:449
[2] Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation[J]. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, 2000,894:i
[3] 孙博喻, 张冰, 林志健, 等. 腹型肥胖的研究进展[J].中华中医药学刊, 2015,33（1）: 80
[4] Bokey L, Chapuis P H, Dent O F. Impact of obesity on complications after resection for rectal cancer[J]. Colorectal Dis,2014,16（11）:896
[5] Van Vugt J L, Cakir H, Kornmann V N, et al. The new Body Mass Index as a predictor of postoperative complications in elective colorectal cancer surgery[J]. Clin Nutr,2015,34（4）:700
[6] Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M, et al. A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography[J]. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord，2002，26（3）:398
[7] 徐玮，朱正伦，陈明敏，等.腹腔脂肪面积与胃癌病人D2淋巴结清扫术后近期结果的关系[J].外科理论与实践，2015，20（5）:425
[8] Ojima T，Iwahashi M，Nakamori M， et al. The impact of abdominal shape index of patients on laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer[J]. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery，2012， 397（3）:437
[9] 中国超重/肥胖医学营养治疗专家共识编写委员会.中国超重/肥胖医学营养治疗专家共识（2016年版）[J]. 糖尿病天地（临床），2016，10（9）:395
[10] Examination Committee of Criteria for ‘Obesity Disease’in Japan. New criteria for‘obesity disease’ in Japan[J]. Circ J, 2002， 66（11）:987
[11] Jang Y, Kim O Y, Ryu H J, et al. Visceral fat accumulation determines postprandial lipemic response, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, and endothelial dysfunction in non obese Korean men[J]. J Lipid Res, 2003,44（12）:2356
[12] 朱正伦,李琛,陈军,等.体质量指数及腰围不影响胃癌病人的短期手术结局[J].外科理论与实践, 2011,16（1）:54
[13] Gretschel S, Christoph F, Bembenek A, et al. Body mass index does not affect systematic D2 lymph node dissection and postoperative morbidity in gastric cancer patients[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2003,10（4）:363
[14] Lee S S, Ryu S W, Kim I H, et al. Impact of gender and body mass index on surgical outcomes following gastrectomy: an Asia-Pacific perspective[J]. Chin Med J （Engl）, 2012,125（1）:67
[15] 江崇民, 张一民, 张彦峰, 等. 中国城镇居民身体脂肪分布及增龄变化规律的研究[J]. 体育科学, 2008,（8）:16
[16] 王红兵, 王毓彬， 蒲志忠，等. 不同体质指数直肠癌患者行腹腔镜手术的疗效及预后分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志， 2016（1）:110
[17] 杨常印. 不同体质指数直肠癌患者腹腔镜根治术后疗效比较[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志， 2014，18（5）:339
[18] 刘林， 王海江， 孟涛， 等. 体质指数增加对腹腔镜直肠癌手术及其临床效果的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志， 2013，93（26）:2029

相似文献/References:

[1]付 蔷,徐文贵,于筱舟,等.早期18F-FDG PET/CT显像在结直肠癌术后再分期中的临床价值[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(01):38.
　FU Qiang,XU Wen-gui,YU Xiao-zhou,et al.Value of early postoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in restaging of the colorectal carcinoma[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(05):38.
[2]孙家硕,罗 营,袁碧波.II型剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的微创处理[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(01):67.
[3]吴 文,崔华雷,王晓晔,等.腹腔镜治疗小儿鞘膜积液疗效观察[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(05):462.
[4]万 音,程 曼,王梦影,等.膳食纤维肠内营养制剂对结直肠癌患者术后肠道屏障应激及营养指标的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(02):105.
　WAN Yin,CHENG Man,WANG Meng-ying,et al.Effect of dietary fiber enteral nutrition preparation on postoperative intestinal barrier stress and nutritional index in patients with colorectal cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,25(05):105.
[5]贾朝阳,徐文贵,朱 磊,等.18F-FDG PET/CT在结直肠癌术后预后中的应用[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(04):342.
　JIA Zhao-yang,XU Wen-gui,ZHU Lei,et al.The application of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prognosis of postoperative colorectal cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,25(05):342.
[6]李璐,李晓飞,孙悦,等.结直肠癌患者肠道菌群促进Apcmin/+小鼠肠道腺瘤进展的研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(06):551.
　LI Lu,LI Xiao-fei,SUN Yue,et al.Gut microbiota from patients with colorectal cancer promotes the progression of intestinal adenoma in Apcmin/+ mice[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,25(05):551.
[7]孙冉,习贵富,赵楠,等.结直肠癌中PAQR3的表达水平及临床病理意义[J].天津医科大学学报,2023,29(06):582.
　SUN Ran,XI Gui-fu,ZHAO Nan,et al.The expression level and clinicopathologic significance of PAQR3 in colorectal cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2023,29(05):582.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

文章编号 １００６－８１４７（２０18）０5-0420-05 作者简介 吕文浩（1990-），硕士在读，研究方向：胃肠肿瘤；通信作者：李卫东， E-mail: tjmughlwd@163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-30