|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王艺霖,宜建英,周春雷,等.奥密克戎低流行时期新型冠状病毒肺炎与甲型流感的流行特点分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2024,30(02):162-166.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.02.0162]
 WANG Yilin,YI Jianying,ZHOU Chunlei,et al.Analysis of epidemic characteristics of COVID-19 and influenza A during the low prevalence period of Omicron[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2024,30(02):162-166.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.02.0162]
点击复制

奥密克戎低流行时期新型冠状病毒肺炎与甲型流感的流行特点分析 (PDF)
分享到:

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
30卷
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
162-166
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2024-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of epidemic characteristics of COVID-19 and influenza A during the low prevalence period of Omicron
文章编号:
1006-8147(2024)02-0162-05
作者:
王艺霖1宜建英2周春雷2穆红2
(1.天津医科大学一中心临床学院,天津 300192;2.天津市第一中心医院检验科,天津 300192)
Author(s):
WANG Yilin1YI Jianying2ZHOU Chunlei2MU Hong2
(1.The First Central Clinical School,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300192,China; 2.Department of Clinical Laboratory,Tianjin First Central Hospital,Tianjin 300192,China)
关键词:
新型冠状病毒肺炎奥密克戎甲型流感流行趋势实验室指标
Keywords:
COVID-19 Omicron influenza A epidemic trend laboratory indicators
分类号:
R373.1
DOI:
10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.02.0162
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:分析奥密克戎(Omicron)低流行时期新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)和甲型流感(Inf A)的流行特点。方法:分析2023年1—4月天津市第一中心医院发热门诊不同呼吸道病毒的每日检出率并进行相关检验;根据感染情况分为COVID-19组(n=190)和Inf A组(n=376),收集患者的基本资料和实验室检测结果并进行比较。结果:发热门诊检出的呼吸道病毒以新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)和甲型流感病毒(IAV)为主,SARS-CoV-2检出率整体呈下降趋势(Z=-5.004),总阳性率为8.64%(520/6 019),IAV检出率整体呈上升趋势(Z=6.132),总阳性率为48.17%(3 221/6 687),在520例SARS-CoV-2阳性患者中有52例合并IAV感染,合并感染率为10.00%(52/520)。与Inf A组相比,COVID-19组年龄较大(Z=-4.00,P<0.05),性别比例差异无统计学意义;在血常规指标中,与Inf A组相比,COVID-19组红细胞分布宽度变异系数(RDW-CV)、血小板(PLT)计数、血小板分布宽度(PDW)、白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞计数(NC)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)较高(Z=-3.68、t=-2.25、Z=-4.50、-2.38、-3.32、-3.97,均P<0.05),红细胞计数(RBC)、红细胞压积(HCT)、血红蛋白浓度(HGB)和淋巴细胞计数(LC)较低(Z=-2.79、-3.13、-2.80,均P<0.05);在肝功能指标方面,COVID-19组总蛋白(TP)和白蛋白(ALB)水平均明显低于Inf A组(t=2.93、3.12,均P<0.05);与Inf A组相比,COVID-19组血糖(GLU)水平更高(t=-2.80,P<0.05);而两组的肾功能指标和炎症指标C反应蛋白(CRP)差异无统计学意义。结论:在Omicron低流行时期Inf A出现高流行趋势,并存在合并感染的风险。两种疾病虽然症状相似但实验室指标存在明显差异。
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the epidemic characteristics of novel coronavirus(COVID-19) and influenza A(Inf A) during the low prevalence period of Omicron. Methods:Trend test was conducted on the daily detection rates of different respiratory viruses in the fever clinic of Tianjin First Central Hospital from January to April 2023. According to patients′ infection condition,they were divided into COVID-19 group(n=190) and Inf A group(n=376). Their basic information and laboratory test results were collected and compared. Results:The respiratory viruses detected in the fever clinics were mainly severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2) and influenza A virus(IAV). The overall detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 was decreasing(Z=-5.004),with a total positive rate of 8.64%(520/6 019). The overall detection rate of IAV was increasing(Z=6.132),with a total positive rate of 48.17%(3 221/6 687). Among 520 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients,52 patients were co-infected with IAV,with a co-infection rate of 10.00%(52/520). Compared with Inf A group,the COVID-19 group had a higher age(Z=-4.00,P<0.05),and there was no statistically significant difference in gender ratio. In terms of blood routine indicators,compared with Inf A group,the COVID-19 group′s coefficient of variation of red blood cell distribution width(RDW-CV),platelet(PLD) count,platelet distribution width(PDW),white blood cell count(WBC),neutrophil count(NC) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio(NLR) were higher(Z=-3.68,t=-2.25,Z=-4.50,-2.38,-3.32,-3.97,all P<0.05),while red blood cell count(RBD),hematocrit(HCT),hemoglobin concentration(HGB) and lymphocyte(LC) count were lower(Z=-2.79,-3.13,-2.80,all P<0.05). In terms of liver function indicators,the total protein(TP) and albumin(ALB) levels of patients in the COVID-19 group were significantly lower than those in the Inf A group(t=2.93,3.12,both P<0.05). Compared with Inf A patients,patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 had higher blood glucose(GLU) levels(t=-2.80,P<0.05). However,there was no statistically significant difference in renal function indicators and inflammatory indicator C-reactive protein(CRP) between the two groups. Conclusion:During the low prevalence of Omicron,there is a high trend of Inf A and a risk of co-infection. Although the symptoms of the two diseases are similar,there are significant differences in laboratory indicators.

参考文献/References:

[1] WHO Coronavirus(COVID-19) Dashboard[EB/OL]. [2023-04-23]. https://covid19.who.int/.
[2] KOELLE K,MARTIN M A,ANTIA R,et al. The changing epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2[J]. Science,2022,375(6585):1116-1121.
[3] LONG B,CARIUS B M,CHAVEZ S,et al. Clinical update on COVID-19 for the emergency clinician:presentation and evaluation[J]. Am J Emerg Med,2022,54:46-57.
[4] LE TTB,VASANTHAKUMARAN T,THI H H,et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and its current known unknowns:a narrative review[J]. Rev Med Virol,2023,33(1):e2398.
[5] CHOW E J,UYEKI T M,CHU H Y. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on community respiratory virus activity[J]. Nat Rev Micr-obiol,2023,21(3):195-210.
[6] 中国国家流感中心流感周报[EB/OL]. [2023-04-23]. https://ivdc.chinacdc.cn/cnic/zyzx/lgzb/.
[7] UYEKI T M,HUI D S,ZAMBON M,et al. Influenza[J]. Lancet,2022, 400(10353):693-706.
[8] OSMAN M,KLOPFENSTEIN T,BELFEKI N,et al. A comparative systematic review of COVID-19 and influenza[J]. Viruses,2021,13 (3):452.
[9] ZHANG J,HUANG X,TAO Z. Correlation of clinical characteristics between patients with seasonal influenza and patients infected by the wild type or delta variant of SARS-CoV-2[J]. Front Public Health,2022,10:981233.
[10] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会办公厅,中华人民共和国国家中医药管理局综合司. 新型冠状病毒感染诊疗方案(试行第十版)[J]. 中国医药,2023,18(2):161-166.
[11] 国家卫生健康委办公厅,国家中医药管理局办公室. 流行性感冒诊疗方案(2020年版)[J]. 中国病毒病杂志,2021,11(1):1-5.
[12] TAN J,LIANG L,HUANG P,et al. Changes in influenza activities impacted by NPI based on 4-year surveillance in China:epidemic patterns and trends[J]. J Epidemiol Glob Health,2023,13(3):539-546.
[13] 李姗姗,李艳宇,孙冰洁,等. 2017—2019年北京市东城区流感流行病学特征分析[J]. 中国生物制品学杂志,2022,35(7):836-839.
[14] YANG W,YANG S,WANG L,et al. Clinical characteristics of 310 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant patients and comparison with Delta and Beta variant patients in China[J]. Virol Sin,2022,37(5):704-715.
[15] CUI A,XIE Z,XU J,et al. Comparative analysis of the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of human influenza virus versus human respiratory syncytial virus versus human metapneumovirus infection in nine provinces of China during 2009-2021[J]. J Med Virol,2022,94(12):5894-5903.
[16] 杨芝芝,杨洁,邓建军,等. 血常规指标及比值变化在新型冠状病毒肺炎和流感患者鉴别诊断中的价值研究[J]. 国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(20):2876-2880.
[17] NARDO A D,SCHNEEWEISS-GLEIXNER M,BAKAIL M,et al. Pathophysiological mechanisms of liver injury in COVID-19[J]. Liver Int,2021,41(1):20-32.
[18] SHAFRAN N,ISSACHAR A,SHOCHAT T,et al. Abnormal liver tests in patients with SARS-CoV-2 or influenza-prognostic similarities and temporal disparities[J]. JHEP Rep,2021,3(3):100258.
[19] ALEEM A,SHAH H. Gastrointestinal and hepatic manifestations of coronavirus(COVID-19)[M]. 2nd ed. Treasure Island(FL):StatPearls Publishing,2023:196-209.
[20] BLOOM P P,MEYEROWITZ E A,REINUS Z,et al. Liver biochemistries in hospitalized patients with COVID-19[J]. Hepatology,2021,73(3):890-900.
[21] WANG S,MA P,ZHANG S,et al. Fasting blood glucose at admission is an independent predictor for 28-day mortality in patients with COVID-19 without previous diagnosis of diabetes:a multi-centre retrospective study[J]. Diabetologia,2020,63(10):2102-2111.
[22] LU J Y,WILSON J,HOU W,et al. Incidence of new-onset in-hospital and persistent diabetes in COVID-19 patients: comparison with influenza[J]. E Bio Medicine,2023,90:104487.
[23] KHUNTI K,DEL P S,MATHIEU C,et al. COVID-19,hyperglycemia,and new-onset diabetes[J]. Diabetes Care,2021,44(12):2645-2655.
[24] BATTAGLINI D,LOPES-PACHECO M,CASTRO-FARIA-NETO H C,et al. Laboratory biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis in COVID-19[J]. Front Immunol,2022,13:857573.

相似文献/References:

[1]冯雪,李伯君,赵芳,等.新型冠状病毒肺炎重症患者高氧血症的危害及精准氧气治疗[J].天津医科大学学报,2021,27(04):423.
[2]吴荷宁 综述,彭民 审校.CD4+T、CD8+T淋巴细胞在新型冠状病毒肺炎中的研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2021,27(06):658.
[3]王钰铭,于静波,曾强,等.天津市航空口岸新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情输入情况的时空特征分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2023,29(01):63.
 WANG Yu-ming,YU Jing-bo,ZENG Qiang,et al.Analysis on spatio-temporal characteristics of imported COVID-19 cases in Tianjin aviation port[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2023,29(02):63.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目 天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目资助(TJYXZDXK-015A)
作者简介 王艺霖(1998-),女,硕士在读,研究方向:医学检验技术;通信作者:穆红,E-mail:hongM0813@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-20