|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]余信,蒋佳维,许华,等.血小板联合D-二聚体对脓毒症预后的评估价值[J].天津医科大学学报,2020,26(02):145-148.
 YU Xin,JIANG Jia-wei,XU Hua,et al.Prognostic value of platelet combined with D-dimer in sepsis[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2020,26(02):145-148.
点击复制

血小板联合D-二聚体对脓毒症预后的评估价值(PDF)
分享到:

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
26卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
145-148
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2020-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Prognostic value of platelet combined with D-dimer in sepsis
文章编号:
1006-8147(2020)02-0149-04
作者:
余信1蒋佳维1许华2王勇强2
(1.天津医科大学一中心临床学院,天津300192;2.天津市第一中心医院重症医学科,天津市急救医学研究所,天津300192)
Author(s):
YU Xin1JIANG Jia-wei1XU Hua2WANG Yong-qiang2
(1.The First Central Clinical College,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300192,China;2.Critical Care Unit, Tianjin First Central Hospital,Tianjin Institute of Emergency Medicine,Tianjin 300192,China)
关键词:
脓毒症血小板D-二聚体联合指标预后
Keywords:
sepsis platelet D-dimer combining biomarkers prognosis
分类号:
R631
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨血小板(PLT)联合D-二聚体(D-D)对脓毒症预后的评估价值。方法:收集2016年1月到2019年3月在天津市第一中心医院重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒症病例214例,记录收住24 h内PLT和D-D等数据,根据28 d预后分为生存组和死亡组,分别比较生存组和死亡组PLT和D-D差异,用Logistic回归分析确定脓毒症预后独立危险因素,组建PLT联合D-D的新组合,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评估PLT联合D-D对脓毒症预后的判断价值。结果:(1)与生存组比较,死亡组PLT降低(t=8.167,P<0.01),D-D升高(t=-8.924,P<0.01),差异均具有统计学意义。(2)Logistic回归分析显示PLT、D-D为脓毒症预后的独立危险因素。(3)PLT联合D-D评估脓毒症28 d预后的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.872,大于单独使用PLT、D-D的AUC(0.804、0.788),并且PLT联合D-D的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均高于单独指标。结论:PLT、D-D是评价脓毒症预后的独立危险因素;PLT联合D-D判断脓毒症预后的能力大于单一指标,具有更高的临床价值。
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of platelet (PLT) combined with D-dimer (D-D) in sepsis. Methods: 214 cases of sepsis in intensive care unit(ICU) of Tianjin First Center Hospital from January 2016 to March 2019 were collected. The data of PLT and D-D in 24 h were recorded. According to the prognosis of 28 d, they were divided into survival group and death group. The differences of PLT and D-D between survival group and death group were compared, and the independent risk factors of sepsis prognosis were determined by Logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was drawn, and the prognostic value of PLT and D-D in sepsis were evaluated after established a new combination of PLT and D-D. Results:(1)Compared with survival group, PLT in death group decreased(t=8.167, P < 0.01), D-D increased(t=-8.924, P < 0.01). The differences were statistically significant. (2)Logistic regression analysis showed that PLT and D-D were independent risk factors for sepsis prognosis. (3)The area under the curve(AUC) of 28 d prognosis of sepsis assessed by PLT combined with D-D was 0.872, which was larger than that of AUC(0.804, 0.788) using PLT and D-D alone, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PLT combined with D-D were higher than those of individual indicators. Conclusion: PLT and D-D are independent risk factors for evaluating the prognosis of sepsis. PLT combined with D-D is more effective than single index in judging the prognosis of sepsis and has higher clinical value.

参考文献/References:


[1] Singer M, Deutschman C S, Seymour C W, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)[J]. JAMA, 2016, 315(8):801
[2] Marik P E. Early management of severe sepsis: concepts and controversies[J]. Chest, 2014, 145(6):1407
[3] Hotchkiss R S, Moldawer L L, Opal S M, et al. Sepsis and septic shock[J]. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2016, 2:16045
[4] Tsao C M, Ho S T, Wu C C. Coagulation abnormalities in sepsis[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, 2015, 53(1):16
[5] Cato L D, Wearn C M, Bishop J, et al. Platelet count: a predictor of sepsis and mortality in severe burns[J]. Burns, 2018, 44(2):288
[6] 张德厚, 陈义坤, 刘大东. 脓毒症患者早期血小板功能变化及预后分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2017, 10(1):28
[7] Rodelo J R, De la Rosa G, Valencia M L, et al. D-Dimer is a significant prognostic factor in patients with suspected infection and sepsis[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2012, 30(9):1991
[8] 占志刚, 李春盛. D-二聚体对急诊脓毒症患者预后价值的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2012, 24(3):135
[9] Kim S, Huang Y. Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment[J]. Stat Med, 2017, 36(15):2347
[10] 赵永祯, 李春盛. 生物标志物组合对急诊脓毒症和重度脓毒症患者的诊断价值[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2014, 26(3):153
[11] Greco E, Lupia E, Bosco O, et al. Platelets and multi-organ failure in sepsis[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2017, 18(10): pii: E2200
[12] Drews R E, Weinberger S E. Thrombocytopenic disorders in critically ill patients[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2000, 162(2 Pt 1):347
[13] Claushuis T A, van Vught L A, Scicluna B P, et al. Thrombocytopenia is associated with a dysregulated host response in critically ill sepsis patients[J]. Blood, 2016, 127(24):3062
[14] Thiery-Antier N, Binquet C, Vinault S, et al. Is Thrombocytopenia an early prognostic marker in septic shock?[J]. Crit Care Med, 2016, 44(4):764
[15] Larkin C M, Santos-Martinez M J, Ryan T, et al. Sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia[J]. Thromb Res, 2016, 141:11
[16] 急诊临床应用专家共识组 D-二聚体检测.“D-二聚体检测”急诊临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2013, 22(8):827
[17] Shorr A F, Thomas S J, Alkins S A, et al. D-Dimer correlates with proinflammatory cytokine levels and outcomes in critically ill patients[J]. Chest, 2002, 121(4):1262
[18] Biron B M, Ayala A, Lomas-Neira J L. Biomarkers for sepsis: what is and what might be?[J]. Biomark Insights, 2015, 10(Suppl 4):7
[19] 钟林翠. 脓毒症时血小板的功能改变及抗血小板治疗的研究进展[J]. 医学研究生学报, 2019, 32(2):196

相似文献/References:

[1]高秋文,谢克亮,王卫娜,等.氢气对脓毒症小鼠存活率和肝脏损伤的保护作用[J].天津医科大学学报,2013,19(06):449.
 GAO Qiu-wen,XIE Ke-liang,WANG Wei-na,et al.Protective effects of hydrogen gas on survival rate and liver injury in septic mice[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2013,19(02):449.
[2]高秋文,谢克亮,陈红光,等.Nrf2在富氢液减轻小鼠脓毒症氧化损伤中的作用[J].天津医科大学学报,2014,20(05):354.
 GAO Qiu-wen,XIE Ke-liang,CHEN Hong-guang,et al.Effect of Nrf2 in hydrogen-rich saline to reduce the oxidative damage in septic mice[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2014,20(02):354.
[3]王永旺,喻文立,王清平,等.急性血小板分离或自体血回输对体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者血液保护的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2016,22(06):494.
 WANG Yong-wang,YU Wen-li,WANG Qing-ping,et al.Blood-saving effects of acute plateletpheresis and autologous blood transfusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting by CPB[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2016,22(02):494.
[4]王彦峰,白 洁,李光明,等.血清降钙素原与肾上腺髓质素前体中段肽在婴幼儿细菌性肺炎诊疗中的临床研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(04):314.
 WANG Yan-feng,BAI Jie,LI Guang-ming,et al.Clinical research of serum procalcitonin and MR-pro-adrenomedullin in the diagnosis and treatment of bacterial pneumonia in infants[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(02):314.
[5]齐 颖,陈 兵.脓毒性休克限制性液体复苏的临床研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(04):324.
 QI Ying,CHEN Bing.Clinical study on limited fluid resuscitation in septic shock[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(02):324.
[6]杨蕊,许华,王兵,等.IL-18在脓毒症及脓毒症休克中预测死亡的作用[J].天津医科大学学报,2018,24(02):142.
 YANG Rui,XU Hua,WANG Bing,et al.Role of IL-18 in predicting mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2018,24(02):142.
[7]杨宏伟,牛文彦.探讨uKIM-1、IL-6、T细胞亚群在脓毒症急性肾损伤中早期检测的意义[J].天津医科大学学报,2018,24(02):145.
 YANG Hong-wei,NIU Wen-yan.Value of measuring uKIM,IL-6 and T-cell subsets in sepsis patients with acute kidney injury[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2018,24(02):145.
[8]黄 颖,曹 超,王 军,等.TLR4在脓毒症中对调节性T细胞功能活性的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2018,24(06):492.
 HUANG Ying,CAO Chao,WANG Jun,et al.The effects of TLR4 on regulating the function of Tregs in sepsis[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2018,24(02):492.
[9]吴 枫,李燕华,高玉雷,等.蛋白C活性联合D-二聚体在脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者病情评估中的预测价值研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(03):229.
 WU Feng,LI Yan-Hua,GAO Yu-Lei,et al.Predictive value of protein C activity combined with D-dimer in the evaluation of sepsis and septic shock[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,25(02):229.
[10]郭 菲,王力军,么 颖,等.血浆组蛋白H4与脓毒症患者严重程度及预后关系研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(05):475.
 GUO Fei,WANG Li-jun,YAO Ying,et al.Prognostic value of plasma histone H4 in septic patients[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,25(02):475.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目 天津市第一中心医院科技基金(院CM201809)
作者简介 余信(1989-),女,硕士在读,研究方向:急诊医学;通信
作者:王勇强,E-mail:yongqiangwang1962@sina.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-06-02