|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李亚云,张 萌,刘惠军.同辈比较效应问卷的编制及其对抑郁、焦虑的预测研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2024,30(02):170-174.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.02.0170]
 LI Yayun,ZHANG Meng,LIU Huijun.The development of peer comparative effects questionnaire and its predictive study on depression and anxiety[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2024,30(02):170-174.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.02.0170]
点击复制

同辈比较效应问卷的编制及其对抑郁、焦虑的预测研究(PDF)
分享到:

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
30卷
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
170-174
栏目:
医学心理学
出版日期:
2024-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The development of peer comparative effects questionnaire and its predictive study on depression and anxiety
文章编号:
1006-8147(2024)02-0170-05
作者:
李亚云张 萌刘惠军
(天津医科大学心理学研究所,天津 300070)
Author(s):
LI YayunZHANG MengLIU Huijun
(Institute of Psychology,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China)
关键词:
同辈比较效应社会比较效应抑郁焦虑
Keywords:
social comparisonpeer comparative effectdepressionanxiety
分类号:
R395
DOI:
10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.02.0170
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:编制青年人同辈比较效应问卷(peer comparative effects questionnaire),并考察该问卷对抑郁焦虑的预测作用。方法:应用方便取样法选取330名青年进行问卷初测,对收集的数据进行项目、探索性因子分析,筛选问卷题目,进一步完善问卷。再次应用方便取样法选取350名青年完成经筛选完善后生成的问卷,对收集的数据进行信、效度检验及验证性因素分析;测试后1个月,从350名青年中随机抽取30名进行重测来检验问卷信度。结果:(1)探索性因素分析显示问卷可保留26个题目,可分为自我激励、自我认同、自我怀疑3个维度,总解释率为53. 39%。验证性因素分析显示3因素模型拟合度良好。问卷具有良好的信效度(α=0.81~0.91),可以作为相关研究的评估工具。各维度与相似测量问卷之间相容效度良好(r=0.51~0.76,均P<0.01)。(2)青年人同辈比较效应问卷的自我激励维度可显著负向预测抑郁(β=-0.16,P<0.01);自我怀疑维度能够显著正向预测抑郁(β=0.54,P<0.001)、焦虑(β=0.51,P<0.001)。结论:新编制青年人同辈比较效应问卷能够评估人际比较后产生的自我激励、自我认同和自我怀疑,且具有良好信效度。其中的自我怀疑维度可以有效预测抑郁和焦虑,自我激励维度可以有效预测抑郁。
Abstract:
Objective:To develop a peer comparative effects questionnaire for youth and examine its prediction of depression and anxiety. Methods:Convenient sampling method was used to select 330 young people for the initial questionnaire. Item and exploratory factor analysis were conducted on the collected data to screen questionnaire questions and further improve the questionnaire. Using the convenience sampling method again,an additional 350 young people were selected to complete the refined version,and the collected data was subjected to reliability and validity tests and confirmatory factor analysis. One month later,30 individuals were randomly chosen from 350 young people for a retest to evaluate test-retest reliability. Results:(1) Exploratory analysis showed that the questionnaire retained 26 items across three dimensions:self-enhancement,self-identification,and self-doubt,explaining 53.39% variance. Confirmatory analysis showed that the three-factor model had a good fit. The questionnaire showed strong reliability and validity(α=0.81-0.91) which could be used as an evaluation tool for related studies. The compatibility validity between dimensions and similar measurement questionnaires was good(r=0.51-0.76,all P<0.01). (2) The self-enhancement dimension of the peer comparison effect questionnaire among young people was significantly negatively predicted depression(β=-0.16,P<0.01). Self-doubt dimensionwas significantly positively predicted depres-sion(β=0.54,P<0.001) and anxiety(β=0.51,P<0.001) among youth. Conclusion:The recently devised Youth Peer Comparative Effects Questionnaire assesses self-enhancement,self-identification,and self-doubt stemming from peer comparisons effectively,with strong reliability and validity. Self-doubt dimension predicts depression and anxiety,while self-enhancement dimension predicts depression.

参考文献/References:

[1] 林崇德,杨治良,黄希庭. 心理学大辞典下[M]. 上海:上海教育出版社,2003:1250-1251.
[2] 肖舒楠. 92.9%受访者坦言自己有同辈压力[EB/OL]. [2012/3/27]. http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2012-03/27/nw.D110000zgqnb_20120327_2 -07.htm.
[3] RAAT J,KUKS J,COHEN-SCHOTANUS J. Learning in clinical practice:stimulating and discouraging response to social comparison[J]. Med Teach,2010,32(11):899-904.
[4] FESTINGER L. A theory of social comparison processes[J]. Hum Relat,1954,7(1):117-140.
[5] BUUNK A P,GIBBONS F X. Social comparison and social psychology:understanding cognition,intergroup relations,and culture[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005:15-32.
[6] WHEELER L. Motivation as a determinant of upward comparison[J]. J Exp Soc Psychol,1966,1(1):27-31.
[7] COLLINS R L. For better or worse:the impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluations[J]. Psychol Bull,1996,119(1):51-69.
[8] 王蜜源,韩芳芳,刘佳,等. 大学生抑郁症状检出率及相关因素的meta分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志,2020,34(12):1041-1047.
[9] LI J,ZHANG N,YAO M,et al. Academic social comparison and depression in chinese adolescents:the mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction[J]. School Ment Health,2021,13(4):719-729.
[10] APPEL H,CRUSIUS J,GERLACH A L. Social comparison,envy,and depression on Facebook:a study looking at the effects of high comparison standards on depressed individuals[J]. J Soc Clin Psychol,2015,4(34):277-289.
[11] FEINSTEIN B A,HERSHENBERG R,BHATIA V,et al. Negative social comparison on facebook and depressive symptoms:rumination as a mechanism[J]. Psychol Pop Media Cult,2013,2(3):161-170.
[12] VERDUYN P,GUGUSHVILI N,KROSS E. The impact of social network sites on mental health:distinguishing active from passive use[J]. World Psychiatry,2021,20(1):133-134.
[13] PARK S Y,BAEK Y M. Two faces of social comparison on facebook:the interplay between social comparison orientation,emotions,and psychological well-being[J]. Comput Hum Behav,2018, 79(11):83-93.
[14] VANDERZEE K,BUUNK B,SANDERMAN R,et al. Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment[J]. Pers Individ Differ,2000,28(1):17-34.
[15] 杨露. 员工的社会比较及其与工作压力的关系研究[D]. 南京:南京师范大学,2011.
[16] KROENKE K,SPITZER R L,WILLIAMS J B W. The PHQ-9:validity of a brief depression severity measure[J]. J Gen Intern Med,2001,16(9):606-613.
[17] SPITZER R L,KROENKE K,WILLIAMS J B W,et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder:the GAD-7[J]. Arch Intern Med Res,2006,10(166):1092-1097.
[18] 何筱衍,李春波,钱洁,等. 广泛性焦虑量表在综合性医院的信度和效度研究[J]. 上海精神医学,2010,22(4):200-203.
[19] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS 的操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:97-98.
[20] 吴愈晓,张帆. “近朱者赤”的健康代价:同辈影响与青少年的学业成绩和心理健康[J]. 教育研究,2020,41(7):123-142.
[21] DIJKSTRA P,KUYPER H,Van Der WERF G P,et al. Social comparison in the classroom:a review[J]. Rev Educ Res,2008,78(4):828-879.
[22] ABRAMSON L,SELIGMAN M,TEASDALE J. Learned helplessness in humans:critique and reformulation[J]. J Abnorm Psychol,1978,87(1):49-74.
[23] BUUNK B P,GIBBONS F X. Health,coping,and well-being:perspectives from social comparison theory[M]. New York:Lawre-nce Erlbaum Associates Publishers,1997:299-328.
[24] ALICKE M D,LARGO E. The role of self in the false consensus effect[J]. J Exp Soc Psychol,1995(31):28-47.
[25] WEBSTER J M,DUVALL J,GAINES L M,et al. The roles of praise and social comparison information in the experience of pride[J]. J Soc Psychol,2002,143(2):209-232.
[26] LOCKWOOD P,KUNDA Z. Superstars and me:predicting the impact of role models on the self[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol,1997,73(1):91-103.
[27] ARIGO D,SULS J M,SMYTHC J M. Social comparisons and chronic illness:research synthesis and clinical implications[J]. Health Psychol Rev,2014,8(2):154-214.
[28] LI J,ZHANG N,YAO M,et al. Academic social comparison and depression in chinese adolescents:the mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction[J]. School Ment Health,2021,4(13):719-729.
[29] MCCARTHY P A,MORINA N. Exploring the association of social comparison with depression and anxiety:a systematic review and meta-analysis.[J]. Clin Psychol Psychother,2020,27(5):640-671.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介 李亚云(1999-),女,硕士在读,研究方向:动机与情绪;通信作者:刘惠军,E-mail:lhjun88@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-20