«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:

27卷

期数:

2021年03期

页码:

301-304

栏目:

技术与方法

出版日期:

2021-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

The clinical value of multiple sequence MRI in detecting gallstones

文章编号:

1006-8147(2021)03-0301-04

作者:

刘广宇; 孙浩然; 白人驹

天津医科大学总医院医学影像科，天津 300052

Author(s):

LIU Guang-yu; SUN Hao-ran; BAI Ren-ju

Department of Radiology，General Hospital，Tianjin Medical University，Tianjin 300052，China

关键词:

胆系结石; MRI; 胆色素石; 胆固醇石

Keywords:

gallstones; MRI; pigment gallstone; cholesterol gallstone

分类号:

R445.2

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：探讨胆系结石MRI检出的适宜序列，评价MRI推测胆系结石类型的可行性。方法：回顾性分析临床诊断胆石症，且手术取出最大径＞8 mm的胆囊或胆管结石的30例患者。术前行上腹部轴面三维脂肪抑制快速扰相梯度回波（3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI）、脂肪抑制快速扰相梯度回波（FSPGR-FS T1WI）、稳态采集快速成像（FIESTA）和脂肪抑制快速自旋回波（FSE-FS T2WI）序列扫描。30例患者中，胆色素石16例，胆固醇石14例。观察各序列结石的信号特点，测量信号强度，计算结石检出率。采用 McNemar′s检验对各序列胆系结石的检出率差异进行组间比较。采用Mann-Whitney U 检验比较胆色素石与胆固醇石各序列信号强度之间的差异。结果：3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI和FIESTA序列对胆系结石的检出率分别为93.33%（28/30）和96.67%（29/30）。胆色素石在3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI上表现特征性高信号, 绝大部分胆固醇石在所有MRI序列中为均匀或混杂的低信号。3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI上，胆色素石的信号强度高于胆固醇石[146.3（42.12）vs.32.15（35.61），P<0.000 1]。结论：3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI和FIESTA序列对胆系结石的检出率高，3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI有助于结石的分类。

Abstract:

Objective: To explore optimal MRI sequences in the detection and classification of gallstones，and evaluate the feasibility of MRI in predicting the types of gallstones. Methods：The MR imagings of 30 patients with gallstones confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. All included gallstones were larger than 8 mm and were classified into two subtypes，pigment and cholesterol. The 3D fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging with fat saturation（3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI），in-phase fast spoiled gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging（FSPGR-FS T1WI），fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition（FIESTA），and single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging with fat saturation（FSE-FS T2WI） were further applied in epigastrium before operation. The signal characteristics of each sequence were observed，the signal intensity was measured，and the stone detection rate was calculated. The difference of the detection rate of biliary stones in each sequence were compared using McNemar′s test. The signal intensity of gallstones between different sequence of pigment and cholesterol were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Results： Among 30 patients，there were 16 cases with pigment gallstone and 14 cases with cholesterol gallstone. The detection rate of gallstones was 93.33%（28/30） and 96.67%（29/30） on 3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI and FIESTA sequences，respectively. On 3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI sequence，most pigment gallstones presented with high signal. Most of the cholesterol gallstone appeared as homogenous or mixed low signal on all MRI sequences. The corrected average signal intensity of pigment gallstones were statistically higher than cholesterol gallstone on 3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI [146.3（42.12）vs.32.15（35.61），P<0.000 1]. Conclusion： 3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI and FIESTA sequences are sensitive to detect gallstones，especially 3D-FSPGR-FS T1WI is helpful to classify the type of gallstones.

参考文献/References:

[1] Yu H，Uyeda J W. Imaging of acute hepatobiliary dysfunction[J]. Radiol Clin North Am，2020，58（1）：45
[2] Cai J S，Qiang S，Bao-Bing Y. Advances of recurrent risk factors and management of choledocholithiasis[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol，2017， 52（1）：34
[3] 傅培彬，张圣道，戴坤扬，等. 以胆石剖面结构及化学成分为基础的结石分类法[J]. 中华外科杂志，1984，22（5）：258
[4] Shabanzadeh D M. Incidence of gallstone disease and complications[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol，2018，34（2）：81
[5] 施维锦. 胆道外科学[M]. 上海：上海科学技术出版社，1993：150
[6] Qiao T，Ma R H，Luo X B，et al. The systematic classification of gallbladder stones[J]. PLoS One，2013，8（10）：e74887
[7] 石景森，王炳煌. 胆道外科基础与临床[M]. 北京：人民卫生出版社，2003：467
[8] Lamanna A，Maingard J，Bates D，et al. Percutaneous transhepatic laser lithotripsy for intrahepatic cholelithiasis： a technical report[J]. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol，2019，63（6）：758
[9] Tazuma S，Unno M，Igarashi Y，et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016[J]. J Gastroenterol，2017， 52（3）：276
[10] 李兆申. 现代消化病药物治疗学[M].北京：人民军医出版社，2005：448
[11] Chen H，Jorissen R，Walcott J，et al. Incidence and predictors of common bile duct stones in patients with acute cholecystitis： a systematic literature review and meta-analysis[J]. ANZ J Surg，2020， 90（9）：1598
[12] Tsai H M，Lin X Z，Chen C Y，et al. MRI of gallstones with different compositions[J]. Am J Roentgenol，2004，182（6）：1513
[13] Ukaji M，Ebara M，Tsuchiya Y，et al. Diagnosis of gallstone composition in magnetic resonance imaging： in vitro analysis[J]. Eur J Radiol，2002，41（1）：49
[14] Shen T，Lin C，Yang Z，et al. Presence of free radicals in pigment gallstone in vivo[J]. Chin Med J （Engl），1996，109（6）：446
[15] Erden A，Halilo■lu N，Gen?觭 Y，et al. Diagnostic value of T1-weighted gradient-echo in-phase images added to MRCP in differentiation of hepatolithiasis and intrahepatic pneumobilia[J]. Am J Roentgenol，2014，202（1）：74

相似文献/References:

[1]孙静,蔡跃增.肋骨少见单发膨胀性病变的影像学诊断[J].天津医科大学学报,2013,19(05):421.
[2]侯 萍,张 虹.泪腺腺样囊性癌93例临床分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2016,22(06):528.
[3]徐学鑫,赵 滨,胡晓丽.儿童颌面部Kimura病1例[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(01):84.
[4]菅影超,付东山,王伟.基于3D深度卷积神经网络依据MRI生成伪CT的研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2020,26(02):133.
　JIAN Ying-chao,FU Dong-shan,WANG Wei.Study on generating pseudo-CT image based on MRI using 3D deep convolutional neural network[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2020,26(03):133.
[5]温鹏,韩玉娟,杨剑,等.肝细胞癌患者缩短普美显强化MRI检查中肝胆期时间的探索[J].天津医科大学学报,2022,28(04):433.
　WEN Peng,HAN Yu-juan,YANG Jian,et al.Exploration of shortening the duration of hepatobiliary phase in EOB enhanced MRI for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2022,28(03):433.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者简介 刘广宇（1975-），男，主治医师，学士，研究方向：腹盆部影像诊断；
通信作者：白人驹，E-mail：cjr.bairenju@vip.163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-05-30