|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]龚晓妍,赵 岳,魏 力,等.SF-36量表应用于天津市滨海新区职业人群的信度和效度研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(04):408-411.
　GONG Xiao-yan,ZHAO Yue,WEI Li,et al.Reliability and Validity in occupational groups of Tianjin Binhai New District：A 36-Item Short Form Health Survey[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,25(04):408-411.
点击复制

SF-36量表应用于天津市滨海新区职业人群的信度和效度研究(PDF)
分享到：

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
25卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
408-411
栏目:
预防医学
出版日期:
2019-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reliability and Validity in occupational groups of Tianjin Binhai New District：A 36-Item Short Form Health Survey
文章编号:
1006-8147(2019)04-0408-04
作者:
龚晓妍1; 赵 岳1; 魏 力2; 宋 崑 2; 从继妍1
（1.天津医科大学护理学院，天津 300070；2.天津医科大学总医院空港医院健康管理科，天津 300308）
Author(s):
GONG Xiao-yan1;  ZHAO Yue1;  WEI Li2;  SONG Kun2; CONG Ji-yan1
(1. School of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China; 2. Department of Health Management Center, Airport Hospital, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300308, China)
关键词:
SF-36量表; 职业人群; 信度; 效度; 生活质量
Keywords:
SF-36 scale; occupational groups; reliability; validity; quality of life
分类号:
R181.2
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：考评美国简明健康状况调查量表（SF-36）在天津市滨海新区职业人群中的信度和效度。方法：便利抽样方法从天津医科大学总医院空港医院健康管理中心体检受检者中抽取调查对象，采用SF-36对其进行调查，获得有效样本829例。通过计算折半信度、Cronbach’s α系数、校标效度、结构效度等指标考察SF-36的信度和效度。结果：SF-36折半信度的Spearman-Brown系数为0.827，Cronbach’s α系数为 0.767。在结构效度的评价中，因子分析产生了2个公因子，分别代表生理因子和心理因子, 解释总体方差的56.61 %。结论：SF-36应用于天津市滨海新区职业人群具有较好的信度和效度，适用于评价天津市职业人群的生活质量。
Abstract:
Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of SF-36 scale applied for occupational groups of Tianjin Binhai New District. Methods: All 829 participants were recruited by convenience sampling from Health Management Center, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Airport Hospital. The reliability and validity of SF-36 were evaluated by calculating the split-half reliability, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, criterion validity and construct validity. Results: The split-half reliability of SF-36 was 0.827, and Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.767. The factor analysis produced two components, accounting for 56.61% of total variance. Conclusion: The Sf-36 scale applied for occupational groups of Tianjin Binhai New District has better reliability and validity, and may be a suitable measure to assess the quality of life among occupational groups in Tianjin.

参考文献/References:


[1] Salim S, Yamin M, Alwi I, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire on Patients with Permanent Pacemakers[J]. Acta Med Indones, 2017, 49(1):10
[2] Vilagut G, Valderas J M, Ferrer M, et al. Interpretation of SF-36 and SF-12 questionnaires in Spain: physical and mental components[J]. Med Clin (Barc), 2008, 130:726
[3] 邓兰兰,李洁,陈珑,等. SF-36量表应用于老年轻度认知功能障碍病人的信效度研究[J]. 护理研究, 2014，28(9A):3190
[4] Terwee C B, Bot S D, de Boer M R, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2007, 60(1):34
[5] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2012:196
[6] 吴明隆. SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:中国铁道出版社, 2000:7
[7] Zhang Y, Qu B, Lun S S, et al. The 36-item short form health survey: reliability and validity in Chinese medical students[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2012,9(7):521
[8] 张磊,徐德忠,黄久仪,等. SF-36量表中文版的应用及分级截断点选择的研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2004, 25(1):69
[9] Tsiga E, Panagopoulou E, Niakas D.Health promotion across occupational groups: one size does not fit all[J].Occup Med (Lond), 2015, 65(7):552
[10] 陶丽丽,韩晓燕,任佩佳,等. 北京市朝阳区职业人群超重及肥胖影响因素研究[J]. 中国健康教育，2018, 34(8):714
[11] 郑湃,李春英,胡贵平,等. 我国2006年职业人群心血管疾病中文文献计量学分析[J]. 中国职业医学, 2018, 45 (5):626
[12] Salazar F R, Bernabé E. The Spanish SF-36 in Peru: factor structure, construct validity, and internal consistency[J].Asia Pac J Public Health,2015, 27(2):2372
[13] 陈天辉, 李鲁, Joerg M S, 等. 健康相关生命质量测量工具SF-36 第二版和第一版的比较[J]. 中国社会医学杂志,2006,23(2):111
[14] 李鲁,王红妹,沈毅. SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2002, 36(2):109

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介 龚晓妍（1983-），女，主管护师，硕士在读，研究方向：预防医学；通信作者：赵岳，E-mail: yuezhao35@hotmail.com 。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-28