|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]翁秀芳,董卫莉,张慕军.气相色谱法测定药物中间体2-甲基咪唑中乙醛的残留量[J].天津医科大学学报,2019,25(04):320-323328.
 WENG Xiu-fang,DONG Wei-li,ZHANG Mu-jun.Determination of acetaldehyde in drug intermediates 2-methylimidazole by GC direct injection[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2019,25(04):320-323328.
点击复制

气相色谱法测定药物中间体2-甲基咪唑中乙醛的残留量(PDF)
分享到:

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
25卷
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
320-323328
栏目:
基础医学
出版日期:
2019-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Determination of acetaldehyde in drug intermediates 2-methylimidazole by GC direct injection
文章编号:
1006-8147(2019)04-0320-04
作者:
翁秀芳1董卫莉1张慕军2
(1. 天津医科大学药学院药物化学教研室,天津市临床药物关键技术重点实验室,天津300070;2. 天津药物研究院原料药研究中心,天津300193)
Author(s):
WENG Xiu-fang1 DONG Wei-li1 ZHANG Mu-jun2
(1. Department of Medical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Key Laboratory on Technologies Enabling Development of Clinical Therapeutics and Diagnosthcs(Theranostics), Tianjin 300070, China; 2 Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Pharmaceutical Research, Tianjin 300193, China)
关键词:
气相色谱法液体进样2-甲基咪唑乙醛残留量测定
Keywords:
GC (Gas chromatography) direct injection2-methylimidazoleacetaldehyderesidue
分类号:
R961
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:建立药物中间体2-甲基咪唑中乙醛残留量的测定方法。方法:采用气相色谱法,液体进样,以Agilent DB-624(75 m × 530 μm × 3 μm)为分析柱,FID检测器;恒温:50 ℃,保持5.5 min;N2流量为6 mL·min-1;后运行:温度为240 ℃,保持10.5 min, 流量为8 mL·min-1。采用外标法。结果:液体进样可以避免高温条件下的基质效应对乙醛测定的影响,乙醛在1.36~ 188.96 μm·mL-1内线性关系良好,R2=0.999 9,方法的回收率在99.74%~102.87%且RSD(n=9)=1.19%,最低检出限为0.55 μm·mL-1。结论:气相液体进样法操作简单、专属性强、重现性强、灵敏度高,可以用于乙醛残留量的检测。
Abstract:
Objective: To establish a GC method for determination of acetaldehyde in drug intermediates 2-methylimidazole. Methods: GC direct injection was performed on Aglilent DB-624(75 m × 530 μm × 3 μm) with FID detector. The column temperature was controlled at 50 ℃, maintained for 5.5 min at the flow rate of N2 of 6 mL·min-1. The postrun temperature was controlled at 240 ℃, maintained for 10.5 min at the flow rate of N2 of 8 mL·min-1. External reference method was applied to analyze data. Results: Under the chromatographic condition mentioned above, the influence of matrix effect was ignored. The calibrated linear curve of acetaldehyde was in between the rang of 1.36~188.96 μm·mL-1 with R2 = 0.999 9. The average recovery of acetaldehyde was between 99.74% and 102.87% with RSD(n=9) =1.19%, 0.55 μm·mL-1 was lower limit of detection for this method. Conclusion: The determination of acetaldehyde may be solved by GC indirect injection, indicating the good specificity, high reproducibility and high sensitivity.

参考文献/References:


[1] Lyvers E 1, Elliott D P. Topical Metronidazole for Odor Control in Pressure Ulcers [J]. Consult Pharm, 2015, 30(9): 523
[2] Cherian P T, Wu X, Yang L, et al. Gastrointestinal localization of metronidazole by a lactobacilli-inspired tetramic acid motif improves treatment outcomes in the hamster model of clostridium difficile infection[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2015, 70(11): 3061
[3] Zhang L l, Chang J J, Zhang S L, et al. Synthesis and bioactive evaluation of novel hybrids of metronidazole and berberine as new type of antimicrobial agents and their transportation behavior by human serum albumin [J]. Bioorg Med Chem, 2013, 21(14): 4158
[4] Kim H, Lee Y, Yoo H, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of sulfate conjugated metronidazole as a colon-specific prodrug of metronidazole[J]. Drug Target, 2012, 20(3):255
[5] Perry, James W. Surface active agents and detergents[M]. Intersci ence, 1958:69-78
[6] Paiano V, Bianchi G, Davoli E, et al. Risk assessment for the Italian population of acetaldehyde in alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages[J]. Food Chem, 2014, 154:26
[7] Lachenmeier D W, Kanteres F, Rehm J. Carcinogenicity of acetaldehyde in alcoholic beverages: risk assessment outside ethanol metabolism[J]. Addiction, 2009, 4(4): 533
[8] Brecher A S, Hellman K, Basista M H, et al. A perspective on acetaldehyde concentrations and toxicity in man and animals[J]. Alcohol, 1997, 14(5):493
[9] Tuma D J, Casey C A, Sorrell M F. Effects of ethanol on hepatic protein trafficking: impairment of receptor-mediated endocytosis[J]. Alcohol Alcoholism, 1990, 25(2/3):117
[10] Lin Y L, Wang P Y, Hsieh L L, et al. Determination of linear aliphatic aldehydes in heavy metal containing waters by high-performance liquid chromatography using 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatization[J]. J Chromatography A, 2009, 1216(36): 6377
[11] Barman B N. Accurate determination of aldehydes in amine catalysts or amines by 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatization[J]. J Chromatography A, 2014, 1327: 19
[12] Uchiyama S, Inaba Y, Kunugita N. Derivatization of carbonyl compounds with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine and their subsequent determination by high-performance liquid chromatography[J]. J Chromatography B, 2011, 879(17/18): 1282
[13] Guan X, Rubin E, Anni H. An optimized method for the measurement of acetaldehyde by high-performance liquid chromatography[J]. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2012, 36(3): 398
[14] de Lima L F, Brand?觔o P F, Donegatti T A, et al. 4-Hydrazinobenzoic acid as a derivatizing agent for aldehyde analysis by HPLC-UV and CE-DAD[J]. Talanta, 2018, 187:113
[15] Heit C, Eriksson P, Thompson D C, et al. Quantification of neural ethanol and acetaldehyde using headspace GC-MS[J]. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 2016, 40(9): 1825
[16] Uebelacker M, Lachenmeier D W. Quantitative determination of acetaldehyde in foods using automated digestion with simulated gastric fluid followed by headspace gas chromatography[J]. J Autom Methods Manag Chem, 2011,2011:907317
[17] Abualhasan M N, Zaid A N, Jaradat N, et al. GC method validation for the analysis of menthol in suppository pharmaceutical dosage form[J]. Int J Anal Chem, 2017, 2017:1728414
[18] Edwardson P A, Bhaskar G, Fairbrother J E. Method validation in pharmaceutical analysis[J]. J Pharm Biomed Anal, 1990, 8(8):929

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介 翁秀芳(1993-),女,硕士在读,研究方向:药学;通信作者: 董卫莉,E-mail: dongweili@tmu.edu.cn,张慕军,E-mail: 20072328@qq.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-28