|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]赵 慧,王春花,孙 蕊,等.萋-尼氏抗酸染色法和金胺O荧光染色法在结核分枝杆菌痰涂片检测中的对比[J].天津医科大学学报,2018,24(04):357-360.
　ZHAO Hui,WANG Chun-hua,SUN Rui,et al.Comparison between Z-N staining method and Auramine O fluorescent staining method in detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum smear[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2018,24(04):357-360.
点击复制

萋-尼氏抗酸染色法和金胺O荧光染色法在结核分枝杆菌痰涂片检测中的对比(PDF)
分享到：

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
24卷
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
357-360
栏目:
技术与方法
出版日期:
2018-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison between Z-N staining method and Auramine O fluorescent staining method in detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum smear
作者:
赵 慧1; 2; 王春花2; 孙 蕊2; 谢 彤2; 穆 成2; 王志锐2; 巨韩芳2; 朱 泽1
1.天津医科大学病原生物学系，天津 300070；2.天津市结核病控制中心结核参比室， 天津 300041
Author(s):
ZHAO Hui1; 2; WANG Chun-hua2; SUN Rui2; XIE Tong2; MU Cheng2; WANG Zhi-rui2; JU Han-fang2; ZHU Ze1
1. Department of Pathogen Biology，Tianjin Medical University，Tianjin 300070 ,China; 2.Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Tianjin Center for Tuberculosis Control，Tianjin 300041，China
关键词:
结核分枝杆菌; 荧光染色法; 萋-尼氏抗酸染色法; 荧光显微镜; 图像采集系统
Keywords:
mycobacterium tuberculosis; fluorescent staining; Zeihl-Neelsen staining; fluorescence microscope; image acquisition system
分类号:
R52
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
Ａ
摘要:
目的：比较萋-尼氏抗酸染色法（简称Z-N）和金胺O荧光染色法（简称荧光染色）在痰涂片镜检中对结核分枝杆菌的检测效果差异。方法：纳入580份痰标本，挑取相同部位制成两份涂片，分别使用Z-N和荧光染色进行染色镜检，比较两种方法的阳性检出率、阳性分级标准及读片时间上的差异。将涂片后余下的痰标本采用全自动分枝杆菌检测/药敏系统做液体培养。结果：Z-N法阳性检出率为10.8%，荧光染色法为15.3%，两种方法比较差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。对两种方法每一级别的结果进行?字2检验，结果表明两种染色方法在各个分级没有统计学差异（P＞0.05）。荧光染色法的读片时间要明显短于Z-N。结论：荧光染色阳性检出率略高于Z-N，证明荧光染色法是一种快速、灵敏的检测方法，对肺结核的临床诊断具有重要意义。
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the difference of mycobacterium tuberculosis detection effect between Z-N staining method and Auramine O fluorescent staining method in microscopy of sputum smear. Methods： Two smears were prepared for the same site of 580 clinical sputum specimens. Two smears were followed with Z-N and fluorescent staining respectively. The difference between two methods including positive detection rate, the standard of positive classification and time of reading were compared. At the same time, phosphate buffer was used to make 60 copies of smear negative control, staining by Z-N and fluorescence respectively. The remaining sputum specimens were tested by automatic Mycobacterium detection / drug sensitivity system for liquid culture. Results: The positive detection rate using Z-N was 10.8%, that of fluorescent staining was 15.3%, and the difference between two methods were considered statisically significant（P＜0.05）. The results showed that there was no statistical difference between the two staining methods in each grade(P＞0.05). Conclusion: The positive detection rate of fluorescence staining is slightly higher than Z-N. It is proved that fluorescence staining is a fast and sensitive detection method, and it may provide important reference for the clinical diagnosis of tuberculous pleuritis.

参考文献/References:


[1] WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2015[R].Geneva:World Health Organization，2015:1-2
[2] 赵雁林.结核病实验室诊断技术培训教程[M].北京:人民卫生出版社，2014:12，32
[3] 黄芳，党丽云，孙惠平，等. 三种分子生物学诊断技术对结核病诊断价值的比较[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志，2015，38（9）:680
[4] 李欣，青清，李多孚.荧光染色法与萋-尼染色法检测结核分枝杆菌的效果评价[J].国际检验医学杂志，2015，36（6）:745
[5] 肖静，杨元好，金瑛，等.荧光染色法检测痰中结核杆菌的应用[J].贵阳中医学学院学报，2013，35（4）:1002
[6] Steingart K R， Henry M， Ng V，et al.Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis:a systematic review[J].Lancet Dis，2006，6（9）:570
[7] 张立，周洪经，冯爽.荧光染色法在结核分支杆菌检测中的应用[J].山东医药，2014，54（7）:55
[8] 曾希鹏，张小芬，陈烨，等.2种染色方法查找痰中结核杆菌的比较[J].中国卫生检验杂志，2014，24（23）：3402
[9] 夏辉，赵冰，李强，等.发光二极管荧光显微镜在基层应用的多中心研究[J].中国防痨杂志，2011，9（33）:592
[10] 桂静，李金莉，王峰.荧光染色法与萋-尼氏抗酸染色法检测痰液中抗酸杆菌的对比观察[J].中国卫生检验杂志，2010，20（11）：2836
[11] 毛小芳， 杨敏， 谢英， 等. 金胺“O”荧光染色LED 显微镜检测痰中抗酸杆菌的应用[J]. 实验与检验医学，2016，34（1）:82

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-20