|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]熊 瑞,王 卫,丁志海,等.EST术取石失败老年复杂性胆总管结石患者行胆管支架放置的治疗[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(05):434-436.
 XIONG Rui,WANG Wei,DING Zhi-hai,et al.Experience of biliary stent in the treatment? elderly patients with complicated common bile duct stones and stone removal failure by EST[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(05):434-436.
点击复制

EST术取石失败老年复杂性胆总管结石患者行胆管支架放置的治疗(PDF)
分享到:

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
23
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
434-436
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2017-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experience of biliary stent in the treatment? elderly patients with complicated common bile duct stones and stone removal failure by EST
文章编号:
1006-8147(2017)05-0434-03
作者:
熊 瑞王 卫丁志海王 健
(天津海滨人民医院普通外科,天津 300280)
Author(s):
XIONG Rui WANG Wei DING Zhi-hai WANG Jian
(Department of General Surgery; People’s Hospital of Binhai District,Tianjin 300280, China)
关键词:
复杂性胆总管结石老年内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术胆管支架并发症
Keywords:
complicated common bile duct stoneselderlyESTbiliary stentcomplication
分类号:
R657.7
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 :探讨胆管支架术及更换时间对内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(EST)取石失败老年复杂性胆总管结石患者结石清除效果及并发症的影响。方法:选取EST术取石失败老年复杂性胆总管结石患者共150例,以随机数字表法分别分为A组和B组,每组各75例;其中A组患者术后每6个月更换胆管支架,而B组患者则术后每3个月更换胆管支架;比较两组患者术后随访结石清除率、结石直径、结石数量及术后并发症发生率。结果:两组患者术后随访结石清除率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者术后随访结石直径和结石数量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);B组患者术后并发症发生率显著低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:EST术取石失败老年复杂性胆总管结石患者行胆管支架放置在清除结石方面效果确切,而缩短术后胆管支架更换时间有助于降低术后并发症发生风险,提高治疗安全性。
Abstract:
bjective: To investigate the influence of replacement time of biliary stent on stone removal efficiency and complications of elderly patients with complicated common bile duct stones and stone removal failure by EST. Methods: One hundred and fifty elderly patients with complicated common bile duct stones and stone removal failure by EST were randomly divided into two group including A group (75 patients) with postoperative biliary stent replacement for every 6 months and B group (75 patients) with postoperative biliary stent replacement for every 3 months. And the stone removal efficiency, the stone diameter and the stones number with follow-up after operation and the incidence of postoperative complications of both groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in the stone removal efficiency during follow-up after operation between 2 groups(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the stone diameter and the stones number during follow-up after operation between 2 groups(P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications of B group were significantly lower than A group(P<0.05). Conclusion: Biliary stent in the treatment of elderly patients with complicated common bile duct stones and stone removal failure by EST may have the reliable effects on stone removal; and shortening the replacement time of biliary stent can efficiently reduce the risk of postoperative complications and higher the treatment safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]方路,雷钧,邹书兵,等.腹腔镜下胆道镜经胆囊管胆总管取石32例经验[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2012,18(8):642
[2]Lee Y N, Moon J H, Choi H J, et al. Direct biliary drainage using transnasal endoscopy for patients with severe-to-moderate acute cholangitis [J]. Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 28(4): 739
[3]Qin Y S, Li Q Y, Yang F C, et al. Risk factors and incidence of acute pyogenic cholangitis [J]. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis In, 2012, 11(6): 650
[4]Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong X Z, et al. Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones [J]. World J Gastroenterol , 2012, 18(24): 3156
[5]张岚.腹腔镜下治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效影响因素分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志, 2014,19(5):332
[6]于江涛,黄强,王军.腹腔镜胆道探查术与传统开腹手术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床价值比较[J].安徽医科大学学报,2012,47(5):615
[7]葛长青,李全福,刘建辉.腹腔镜辅助胆道镜保胆取石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较[J].中国内镜杂志,2012,18(2):199
[8]鲁家贤,孙伟军,孙玲国,等.内镜微创保胆取石术后胆囊功能的中长期随访报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(9):799
[9]Ramirez G J. Factors related to therapeutic failure in the extraction of bile duct stones forendoscopic retrograde colangiopan creatography ERCP[J]. Rev Gastroenterol Peru, 2011, 31(4): 330
[10]Cerefice M, Sauer B, Javaid M, et al. Complex biliary stones: treatment with removable self-expandable etal stents: a new approach [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2011,74(3): 520
[11]Prachayakul V, Aswakul P, Kachintorn U. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy as an highly effective method for complete large common bile duct stone clearance [J]. J Interv Gastroenterol, 2013, 3(2): 59
[12]Zhang R L, Cheng L, Cai X B, et al. Comparison of the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic biliary decompression by nasobiliary catheter and plastic stent placement in acute obstructive cholangitis [J]. Swiss Med Wkly, 2013, 143(1): w13823
[13]Kim C W, Chang J H, Kim J H, et al. Size and type of periampullary duodenal diverticula are associated with bile duct diameter and recurrence of bile duct stones[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013, 28(5): 893
[14]Patel S N, Rosenkranz L, Hooks B, et al. Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of biliary calculi using single-operator cholangioscopy: a multicenter experience [J].Gastrointest Endosc, 2014, 79(2): 344
[15]Liverani A 1, Muroni M, Santi F, et al. One-step laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: our experience of the last 9 years in a retrospective study [J]. Am Surg, 2013,79 (12) :1243
[16]Peterlejtner T, Szewczyk T, Firkowski P, et al. Endoscopic treatment of the choledocholithiasis--effectiveness, safety and limitations of the method[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2012, 84(7): 333

相似文献/References:

[1]高雪锦,吴存瑾,王 林,等.代谢综合征及非杓型血压与老年人右心室重构关系[J].天津医科大学学报,2014,20(04):293.
 GAO Xue-jin,WU Cun-jin,WANG Lin,et al.Relationship between right ventricular remodeling and the metabolic syndrome and non-dipper blood pressure in senior people[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2014,20(05):293.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介 熊瑞(1975-),男,副主任医师,硕士在读,研究方向:肝胆外科,肛肠外科;E-mail:499329942@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-09-20