|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王 超,余泉峰,徐 勇,等.经直肠超声造影诊断前列腺癌的临床分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2014,20(05):375-378.
 WANG Chao,YU Quan-feng,XU Yong,et al.Clinical analysis of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2014,20(05):375-378.
点击复制

经直肠超声造影诊断前列腺癌的临床分析(PDF)
分享到:

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
20卷
期数:
2014年05期
页码:
375-378
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2014-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Clinical analysis of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer
文章编号:
1006-8147(2014)05-0375-04
作者:
王 超余泉峰徐 勇张志宏乔宝民刘冉录
(天津医科大学第二医院泌尿外科,天津市泌尿外科研究所,天津 300211)
Author(s):
WANG ChaoYU Quan-fengXU YongZHANG Zhi-hongQIAO Bao-minLIU Ran-lu
(Department of Urology, The Second Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Institute of Urology, Tianjin 300211, China)
关键词:
前列腺癌经直肠超声造影穿刺活检
Keywords:
prostate cancer contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography biopsy
分类号:
R737.25
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:探讨经直肠超声造影(CE-TRUS)在前列腺癌(PCa)早期诊断方面的特点及其局限性。 方法:对128例前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和/或直肠指检(DRE)异常的患者,分别进行经直肠超声(TRUS)和CE-TRUS检查,其结果再与穿刺活检或根治手术后病理结果进行对比,同时对CE-TRUS异常区域进行靶向穿刺活检的阳性率与系统穿刺活检进行比较。 结果:128例可疑患者中有56例被确诊为PCa,CE-TRUS异常的有54例,其中有46例为PCa,敏感性为82.1%,而TURS的敏感性仅为64.3%,CE-TRUS检查仅出现8例假阳性和10例假阴性,其假阳性主要是由于良性前列腺增生和急、慢性前列腺炎引起的,而假阴性则主要是由于原发灶位于外周带和移行带的较低PSA水平患者、小体积癌灶、中高分化肿瘤而导致的。对于CE-TRUS异常的54个病例进行靶向穿刺活检的阳性率为77.4%,远高于系统随机的穿刺活检。CE-TRUS的诊断阳性率与PSA水平有明显相关。 结论:对于可疑PCa患者,临床上可以利用CE-TRUS靶向穿刺活检来提高其诊断能力,但也需要充分考虑系统穿刺活检在诊断PCa方面的优势。
Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography (CE-TRUS) for diagnosing prostate cancer. Methods: The 128(改为 A hundred and twenty-eight) cases with abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and/or digital rectal examination (DRE) were examined by TRUS and CRTRUS respectively, and the results were compared with those by pathology of biopsy or radical retro-public prostectomy. The targeted biopsy in abnormal CE-TRUS areas was also compared to systematic biopsy. Results: Among 128 subjects diagnosed with PCa, 54 cases had abnormal CE-TRUS performance, including 46 cases of PCa with 82.1% sensitivity. And the sensitivity of TURS was only 64.3%. Eight false-positive and ten false-negative findings from CE-TRUS were observed. The false-positive was mainly due to BPH, urgent/chronic prostatitis, while the false-negative was mainly due to the original site located in the peripheral zone or transitional zone with low PSA levels, small volume and high differentiation. In Furthermore, the positive rate of targeted biopsy was much higher than that in the system random biopsy in those cases. Significant correlation between the cancer detection rate with CE-TRUS and serum PSA levels were also found Conclusion: CE-TRUS with targeted biopsy can be used to improve the clinical detection rate of prostate cancer. And systematic biopsy should not be excluded due to the unsatisfied false-positive and false-negative compared to targeted biopsy.

 

参考文献/References:

[1] Jemal A, Bray F, Center M M, et al. Global cancer statistics[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2011,61(2):69
[2] Center M M, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates[J]. Eur Urol,2012,61(6):1079
[3] Halpern E J, Verkh L, Forsberg F, et al. Initial experience with contrast-enhanced sonography of the prostate[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2000,174(6):1575
[4] Halpern E J, Rosenberg M, Gomella L G. Prostate cancer: contrast-enhanced us for detection[J]. Radiology,2001,219(1):219
[5] Sedelaar J P, van Leenders G J, Hulsbergen-Van D K C, et al. Microvessel density: correlation between contrast ultrasonography and histology of prostate cancer[J]. Eur Urol,2001,40(3):285
[6] Wink M H, de la Rosette J J, Grimbergen C A, et al. Transrectal contrast enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of prostate cancer[J]. World J Urol,2007,25(4):367
[7] Roy C, Buy X, Lang H, et al. Contrast enhanced color Doppler endorectal sonography of prostate: efficiency for detecting peripheral zone tumors and role for biopsy procedure[J]. J Urol,2003,170(1):69
[8] Caproni N, Marchisio F, Pecchi A, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI[J]. Eur Radiol,2010,20(6):1384
[9] Jack G S, Cookson M S, Coffey C S, et al. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors[J]. J Urol,2002,168(2):519
[10] Yi A, Kim J K, Park S H, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography for prostate cancer detection in patients with indeterminate clinical findings[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2006,186(5):1431
[11] Sano F, Terao H, Kawahara T, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the prostate: various imaging findings that indicate prostate cancer[J]. BJU Int,2011,107(9):1404
[12] Uemura H, Sano F, Nomiya A, et al. Usefulness of perflubutane microbubble-enhanced ultrasound in imaging and detection of prostate cancer: phase II multicenter clinical trial[J]. World J Urol,2013,31(5)1123
[13] Hodge K K, Mcneal J E, Terris M K, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate[J]. J Urol,1989,142(1):71-74, 74
[14] Numao N, Kawakami S, Sakura M, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of prostate cancers missed by initial transrectal 12-core biopsy[J]. BJU Int,2012,109(5):665
[15] Frauscher F, Klauser A, Volgger H, et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection[J]. J Urol,2002,167(4):1648
[16] Halpern E J, Gomella L G, Forsberg F, et al. Contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind trial of dutasteride pretreatment[J]. J Urol,2012,188(5):1739
[17] Ng T K, Vasilareas D, Mitterdorfer A J, et al. Prostate cancer detection with digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen, transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy in clinical urological practice[J]. BJU Int,2005,95(4):545
[18] Zhao H X, Zhu Q, Wang Z C. Detection of prostate cancer with three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound: correlation with biopsy results[J]. Br J Radiol,2012,85(1014):714

相似文献/References:

[1]魏强,齐灿,罗飞,等.转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者多西他赛化疗的预后分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2013,19(05):390.
[2]杨帮东,姜行康,齐 灿,等.尿液中PCA3评分对前列腺癌早期诊断的临床意义[J].天津医科大学学报,2013,19(06):487.
 YANG Bang-dong,JIANG Xing-kang,QI Can,et al.Clinical significance of urinary PCA3 score to diagnose prostate cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2013,19(05):487.
[3]刘利维,刘春雨. MicroRNAs 与前列腺癌的表观遗传学研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2014,20(01):74.
[4]张晓会,张志宏,徐 勇,等.合并症对局限性或局部晚期前列腺癌患者早期生存的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2014,20(05):379.
 ZHANG Xiao-hui,ZHANG Zhi-hong,XU Yong,et al. Influence of complications on early survival of patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2014,20(05):379.
[5]盛 镔,张 蒙,马鹏德,等.核糖体蛋白L37在前列腺癌中的表达及临床意义[J].天津医科大学学报,2015,21(05):401.
 SHENG Bin,ZHANG Meng,MA Peng-de,et al.Expression of ribosomal protein L37 in prostate cancer and its clinical significance[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2015,21(05):401.
[6]管明秀,周云丽,王 萌,等.TuM2-PK,tPSA,fPSA/tPSA和PSAD对PSA灰区前列腺癌诊断价值的比较[J].天津医科大学学报,2016,22(02):140.
 GUAN Ming-xiu,ZHOU Yun-li,WANG-Meng,et al.Diagnostic implication of TuM2-PK, tPSA, fPSA/tPSA ratio and PSAD for prostate cancer in PSA gray area[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2016,22(05):140.
[7]李 江,张恩龙,赵 阳,等.前列腺癌靶向磁共振成像和光热治疗的实验研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(02):93.
 LI Jiang,ZHANG En-long,ZHAO Yang,et al.?Experimental research of targeted magnetic resonance imaging and photo thermal therapy for prostate cancer [J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(05):93.
[8]张一然,潘盼,连振鹏,等.磁共振扫描对经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(02):99.
 ZHANG Yi-ran,PAN Pan,LIAN Zhen-peng,et al.Effect of magnetic resonance imaging scan on the?transrectal ultrasound?prostate biopsy[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(05):99.
[9]薄志强,孙桂江,王 丽,等.CtBP2异常表达对前列腺癌PC3细胞增殖效应影响的研究[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(02):103.
 BO Zhi-qiang,SUNGui-jiang,WANG Li,et al.Effect of abnormal expression of CtBP2 on the proliferation of prostate cancer cell line PC3[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(05):103.
[10]徐庆祝,牛远杰.Gleason 10分前列腺癌患者临床特点分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(04):361.
 XU Qing-zhu,NIU Yuan-jie.Clinical and pathological research of prostate cancer with Gleason score 10[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(05):361.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金项目 天津市科技计划项目(12ZCDZSY16300; 11ZCGYSY02300)

作者简介 王超 (1988-),男,硕士在读,研究方向:泌尿系统肿瘤;

通信作者:徐勇,E-mail:xuyong8816@sina.com

 

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-09-25