|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杜雪.晚期上皮性卵巢癌新辅助化疗的精准抉择:2025 ASCO指南更新解读与临床实践启示[J].天津医科大学学报,2026,32(01):1-5.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2026.01.0001]
 DU Xue.Precision decision-making for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer:ASCO guideline 2025 update and implications for practice[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2026,32(01):1-5.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2026.01.0001]
点击复制

晚期上皮性卵巢癌新辅助化疗的精准抉择:2025 ASCO指南更新解读与临床实践启示(PDF)

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2026年01期
页码:
1-5
栏目:
指南解读
出版日期:
2026-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Precision decision-making for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer:ASCO guideline 2025 update and implications for practice
文章编号:
1006-8147(2026)01-0001-05
作者:
杜雪
(天津市人民医院,南开大学第一附属医院妇科,天津 300121)
Author(s):
DU Xue
(Department of Gynecology, Tianjin Union Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin 300121, China)
关键词:
上皮性卵巢癌新辅助化疗肿瘤细胞减灭术ASCO指南精准医疗临床决策
Keywords:
-
分类号:
R737.31
DOI:
10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2026.01.0001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2025年3月,美国临床肿瘤学会基于61项最新研究证据,重磅更新了《新诊断晚期卵巢癌的新辅助化疗(NACT)指南》。此次更新超越了既往“初始肿瘤细胞减灭术(PCS)联合术后化疗的二元论”,转向一个高度精细化、个体化的决策框架。新指南对初始评估、患者分层、治疗方案(PCS与NACT的选择)、手术时机、腹腔热灌注化疗的应用、术后治疗及进展后管理均提出了明晰且更具操作性的推荐。本文旨在对该指南的核心更新要点进行深度剖析与解读,探讨其背后的循证医学逻辑。指南强调,以妇科肿瘤医生为核心的多学科团队,综合运用现代诊断技术,在精准评估的基础上为患者制定"个体化"的初始治疗策略,是改善晚期卵巢癌患者预后的关键所在。
Abstract:
-

参考文献/References:

[1] HEIKKINEN J, K?魧RKK?魧INEN H, ELORANTA M L, et al. Postoperative complications of upfront ovarian cancer surgery and their effects on chemotherapy delay[J]. Curr Oncol,2024,31(9):5630-5642.
[2] VERGOTE I, TROP?魪 C G, AMANT F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-therapy or primary surgery in stage ⅢC or IV ovarian cancer[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,363(10):943-953.
[3] KEHOE S, HOOK J, NANKIVELL M, et al. Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet,2015,386(9990):249-257.
[4] COLERIDGE S L, BRYANT A, KEHOE S, et al. Neoadjuvant che-motherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021, 7:Cd005343.
[5] WRIGHT A A, BOHLKE K, ARMSTRONG D K, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol,2016,34(28):3460-3473.
[6] GAILLARD S, LACCHETTI C, ARMSTRONG D K, et al. Neoadjuvantchemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: ASCO guideline update[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2025,43(7): 868-891.
[7] WINARNO GNA, HIDAYAT Y M, SOETOPO S, et al. The role of CA-125, GLS and FASN in predicting cytoreduction for epithelial ovarian cancers[J]. BMC Res Notes ,2020,13(1):346.
[8] RIZZO S, DE PIANO F, BUSCARINO V, et al. Pre-operative evaluation of epithelial ovarian cancer patients: role of whole body diffusion weighted imaging MR and CT scans in the selection of patients suitable for primary debulking surgery. A single-centrestudy[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2020,123:108786.
[9] KUMAR A, WANG C, SHEEDY S P, et al. Into the future: a pilot study combining imaging with molecular profiling to predict resecta-bility in ovarian cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol,2022, 166(3):508-514.
[10] CLIMENT MT, SERRA A, GILABERT-ESTELL?魪S J, et al. Comparison of peritoneal carcinomatosis scoring methods in predicting resectability and prognosis in gynecologic malignancies[J]. J Clin Med,2021,10(12):2553.
[11] KONSTANTINOPOULOS P A, NORQUIST B, LACCHETTI C, et al. Germline and somatic tumor testing in epithelial ovarian cancer: ASCO guideline[J]. J ClinOncol,2020,38(11):1222-1245.
[12] ONDA T, SATOH T, SAITO T, et al. Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase Ⅲ randomised trial: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG0602[J]. Eur J Cancer ,2016,64:2231.
[13] MACHIDA H, TOKUNAGA H, MATSUO K, et al. Survival outcome and perioperative complication related to neoadjuvant chemo-therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol,2020,46(5):868-875.
[14] TZANIS A A, IAVAZZO C, HADJIVASILIS A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in FIGO stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ epithelial ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Oncol Rev,2022, 16:10605.
[15] KENGSAKUL M, NIEUWENHUYZEN-DE BOER GM, UDOMKA-RNJANANUN S, et al. Factors predicting postoperative morbidity after cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Gynecol Oncol,2022,33(4):e53.
[16] KONG TW, CHANG SJ, PAEK J, et al. Transvaginalsonography-guided core biopsy of adnexal masses as a useful diagnostic alternative replacing cytologic examination or laparoscopy in advanced ovarian cancer patients[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2016, 26(6):1041-1047.
[17] ODAJIMA S, UEDA K, HOSOYA S, et al. Clinical availability of tumour biopsy using diagnostic laparoscopy for advanced ovarian cancer[J]. In Vivo,2021,35(6):3325-3331.
[18] ONDA T, TANAKA YO, KITAI S, et al. Stage Ⅲ disease of ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers can be accurately diagnosed with pre-operative CT. Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602[J]. Jpn J Clin Oncol,2021,51(2):205-212.
[19] GARCIA GARCIA Y, DE JUAN FERR?魪 A, MENDIOLA C, et al. Efficacy and safety results from GEICO 1205, a randomized phase Ⅱ trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2019, 29(6):1050-1056.
[20] COADA CA, DONDI G, RAVEGNINI G, et al. Optimal number of neoadjuvantchemotherapy cycles prior to interval debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival[J]. J Gynecol Oncol,2023(6),34:e82.
[21] LIONTOS M, PAPATHEODORIDI A, KUNADIS E, et al. Prognostic and predictive significance of CA-125 elimination rate constant K(KELIM) in ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in a real-world setting[J]. J Clin Oncol,2023,41 (Suppl 16):e17594.
[22] LI C, CUI Q, WANG X, et al. CA-125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM) as a promising predictor of complete cytoreduction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer patients: aretrospective study from two Chinese hospitals[J]. BMC Cancer,2024,24(1):609.
[23] BESE T, BICER E, KAYAN BO, et al. 3-4 cycles versus 6 cycles NACT in advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: survival is not determined by the number of NACT cycles[J]. Chemotherapy,2024, 69(2):122-132.
[24] QUESADA S, THOMAS Q D, COLOMBO P E, et al. Optimal first-line medico-surgical strategy in ovarian cancers: are we there yet? [J]. Cancers (Basel) ,2023,15(14):3556.
[25] VAN DE VRIE R, RUTTEN M J, ASSELER J D, et al. Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2019,3(3):Cd009786.
[26] ANTONIO CCP, ALIDA G G, ELENA G G, et al. Cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: a phase 3 clinical trial[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022, 29(4):2617-2625.
[27] PROVENCHER D M, GALLAGHER C J, PARULEKAR W R, et al. OV21/PETROC: a randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup phase Ⅱ study of intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Ann Oncol,2018,29(2):431-438.
[28] TEW W P, LACCHETTI C, ELLIS A, et al. PARP inhibitors in the management of ovarian cancer: ASCO guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol,2022, 38(30):3468-3493.
[29] WRIGHT A A, BOHLKE K, ARMSTRONG D K, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2016, 34(28):3460-3473.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄小娟,王俊艳,齐文慧,等.Axl及其配体Gas6在I型和 II型上皮性卵巢癌中的表达和意义[J].天津医科大学学报,2014,20(05):342.
 HUANG Xiao-juan,WANG Jun-yan,QI Wen-hui,et al.Expression of Axl and its ligand in type I and II epithelial ovarian carcinoma and its clinical significance[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2014,20(01):342.
[2]刘晓楠,卓姗姗,岳玖玲,等.新辅助化疗在局部晚期口腔癌中的疗效分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2015,21(05):408.
 LIU Xiao-nan,ZHUO Shan-shan,YUE Jiu-ling,et al.Clinical curative effect on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced oral cavity cancers[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2015,21(01):408.
[3]王希梅 综述,肖春花 审校.TILs预测不同分子分型乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2018,24(01):91.
[4]张宁,金嘉琪,张少璐,等.ITSN1基因与卵巢癌化疗敏感性和预后的关系[J].天津医科大学学报,2023,29(04):354.
 ZHANG Ning,JIN Jia-qi,ZHANG Shao-lu,et al.Association of ITSN1 gene with chemosensitivity and prognosis in ovarian cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2023,29(01):354.
[5]王军,张占薪,王佳佳,等.LncRNA FAM83H-AS1和miR-136在上皮性卵巢癌中的表达及临床意义[J].天津医科大学学报,2024,30(06):485.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.06.0485]
 WANG Jun,ZHANG Zhanxin,WANG Jiajia,et al.Expression and clinical significance of LncRNA FAM83H-AS1 and miR-136 in epithelial ovarian cancer[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2024,30(01):485.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.06.0485]
[6]张艺珊,杜雪.新辅助化疗对卵巢癌腹膜转移灶CD8+T细胞的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2026,32(02):195.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2026.02.0195]
[7]胡馨元,杜雪.新辅助化疗对上皮性卵巢癌肿瘤微环境中T淋巴细胞的作用[J].天津医科大学学报,2026,32(01):92.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2026.01.0092]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:天津市科学技术局面上项目(ZZJCYBJC00710)
作者简介:杜雪(1974-),女,主任医师,博士,研究方向:妇科肿瘤,妇科内分泌;E-mail:lanlandetommao@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-01-15