|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈雁南,庄淑梅,靳世梅,等.成人脑卒中患者心理痛苦风险预测模型的构建与验证[J].天津医科大学学报,2025,31(02):144-149.
 CHEN Yannan,ZHUANG Shumei,JIN Shimei,et al.Construction and validation of a prediction model of psychological distress risk in adult patients with stroke[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2025,31(02):144-149.
点击复制

成人脑卒中患者心理痛苦风险预测模型的构建与验证(PDF)
分享到:

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
144-149
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2025-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction and validation of a prediction model of psychological distress risk in adult patients with stroke
文章编号:
1006-8147(2025)02-0144-06
作者:
陈雁南庄淑梅靳世梅周雪莹
(天津医科大学护理学院,天津 300070)
Author(s):
CHEN YannanZHUANG ShumeiJIN ShimeiZHOU Xueying
(Nursing College,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China)
关键词:
脑卒中心理痛苦预测模型随机森林
Keywords:
strokepsychological distressprediction modelrandom forest algorithm
分类号:
R743.3
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的:构建成人脑卒中患者心理痛苦风险预测模型,并验证其预测效果。方法:选取2023 年 2 月至10月天津医科大学总医院、天津市第一中心医院、天津市宝坻区人民医院及武警特色医学中心神经科的脑卒中患者428例,采用一般资料调查问卷、心理痛苦温度计(DT)、疼痛数字评价量表(NRS)、一般自我效能感量表(GSES)、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)进行调查,采用单因素分析和二元Logistic回归分析筛选心理痛苦的危险因素,建立Logistic回归预测模型和随机森林预测模型。结果:Logistic回归分析表明年龄、脑卒中类型、NRS得分、GSES得分和PSSS得分是心理痛苦的独立危险因素(OR=1.146、22.435、4.953、0.713、0.920,均P<0.05)。Logistic回归模型与随机森林模型的预测准确率、痛苦准确率和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为93.0%和94.5%、66.7%和87.5%、0.961(0.940~0.982)和0.886(0.789~0.982)。结论:Logistic回归模型与随机森林模型均能预测成人脑卒中患者的心理痛苦,而随机森林模型对于存在明显心理痛苦患者的识别能力和预测效果均优于Logistic回归模型。
Abstract:
Objective:To construct a prediction model of psychological distress risk in adult patients with stroke and validate its prediction effect. Methods:A total of 428 adult stroke patients from the General Hospital of Tianjin Medical University,the First Central Hospital of Tianjin,the People′s Hospital of Tianjin Baodi District and the Special Medical Center of the Armed Police Force were selected from February to October 2023.A self-designed general data questionnaire,Distress Thermometer (DT),Numerical pain Rating Scale (NRS),General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES),and Perceptive Social support Scale (PSSS) were used for the survey. Univariate analysis and binary Logistic regression analysis were employed to identify risk factors associated with psychological distress. Logistic regression prediction model and random forest prediction model were established. Results:Logistic regression analysis showed that age,stroke type,NRS score,GSES score and PSSS score were independent risk factors of mental distress (OR=1.146,22.435,4.953,0.713,0.920,all P<0.05). The prediction accuracy,psychological distress accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC value) of the Logistic regression model and the random forest model were 93.0% and 94.5%,66.7% and 87.5%,0.961 (0.940-0.982) and 0.886 (0.789-0.982),respectively. Conclusion:Both the Logistic regression model and the random forest model can predict psychological distress in adult stroke patients,while the random forest model is better than the Logistic regression model in identifying and predicting patients with significant psychological distress.

参考文献/References:

[1] VIRANI S S,ALONSO A,APARICIO H J,et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update:a report from the American Heart Association[J]. Circulation,2021,143(8):e254-e743.
[2] DONG L,MEZUK B,LISABETH L D. Trends in prevalence of serious psychological distress and depression among adults with stroke in the United States[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis,2022,31(3):106235.
[3] RIBA M B,DONOVAN K A,ANDERSEN B,et al. Distress management,version 3.2019,NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2019,17(10):1229-1249.
[4] DE WIT L,THEUNS P,DEJAEGER E,et al. Long-term impact of stroke on patients′ health-related quality of life[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2017,39(14):1435-1440.
[5] JACKSON C A,SUDLOW CLM,MISHRA G D. Psychological distress and risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in the 45 and up study[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes,2018,11(9):e004500.
[6] ZHANG S,YUAN Y,ZHUANG W,et al. Contributing factors and induced outcomes of psychological stress response in stroke survivors:a systematic review[J]. Front Neurol,2022,13:843055.
[7] TAYLOR J M. Random survival forests[J]. J Thorac Oncol,2011,6(12):1974-1975.
[8] 尹海宁. 基于Logistic回归和随机森林构建急性心肌梗死患者不良心血管事件风险预测模型[D]. 江苏大学,2022.
[9] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682.
[10] 高永祥,张晋昕. Logistic回归分析的样本量确定[J]. 循证医学,2018,18(2):122-124.
[11] 杜姣. 心理痛苦温度计在脑卒中病人中的应用研究[D]. 川北医学院,2018.
[12] National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Distress management. Clinical practice guidelines[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2003,1(3):344-374.
[13] LI C R,ZHANG W,FAN B F. Acomparison between numberic ratingscale(NRS) and verbal rating scale(VRS) in elderly patients withchronic pain[J]. Chin J Pain Med,2016,22(9):683-686.
[14] 王才康,胡中锋,刘勇. 一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40.
[15] ZIMET G D,POWELL S S,FARLEY G K,et al. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support[J]. J Pers Assess,1990,55(3-4):310-317.
[16] 姜乾金. 领悟社会支持量表[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10(10):41-43.
[17] 沈颖,张静,卜庆云,等. 乳腺癌病人心理痛苦水平及其影响因素的纵向研究[J]. 中国护理管理,2018,18(5):617-622.
[18] GARTON A L,SISTII J A,GUPTA V P,et al. Post-stroke post-traumatic stress disorder:a review[J]. Stroke,2017,48(2):507-512.
[19] 王文冉. 脑卒中患者心理痛苦危险因素分析及风险模型构建[D]. 长江大学,2024.
[20] 燕文娟,李壮苗,余梦婷,等. 脑卒中病人病耻感影响因素的系统评价[J]. 护理学报,2022,29(8):46-52.
[21] 卢霞,刘阳,韦路遥. 基于叙事医学的共情护理在脑卒中患者中的应用分析[J]. 心理月刊,2024,19(18):167-169.
[22] 聂玉平,白红民,赵刚,等. 脑卒中后创伤后应激障碍的研究进展[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2022,27(5):407-411.
[23] KEEP R F,HUA Y,XI G. Intracerebral haemorrhage:mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets[J]. Lancet Neurol,2012,11(8):720-731.
[24] 鲍金雷,杨庆爱,张俊,等. 脑卒中半失能老年病人复发恐惧的调查研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2021,56(11):1661-1666.
[25] 张雪梅. 缺血性脑卒中患者症状群发作轨迹及影响因素研究[D]. 长春中医药大学,2024.
[26] NAESS H,LUNDE L,BROGGER J. The effects of fatigue,pain,and depression on quality of life in ischemic stroke patients:the Bergen stroke study[J]. Vasc Health Risk Manag,2012,8:407-413.
[27] 刘婧,何金爱,邓艳芳,等. 脑卒中病人领悟社会支持与抑郁发生的相关性研究[J]. 护理实践与研究,2020,17(3):32-34.
[28] HUNG C T,CHEN Y J,CHAN J C,et al. Psychological distress,social support,self-management ability and utilization of social resources for female patients with cancer in oncology outpatient settings in Taiwan[J]. Support Care Cancer,2020,28(7):3323-3330.
[29] PANJWANI A A,SOUTHWARD M W,FUGATE-LAUS K,et al. Coping self-efficacy,perceived helpfulness of coping,and distress:a longitudinal investigation of breast and gynecologic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy[J]. J Behav Med,2022,45(6):868-881.
[30] HANSON H A,MARTIN C,O′NEIL B,et al. The relative importance of race compared to health care and social factors in predicting prostate cancer mortality:a random forest approach[J]. J Urol,2019, 202(6):1209-1216.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘晓智 综述,杨新宇 审校.小泛素样修饰体在神经系统疾病中的功能研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(03):280.
[2]高伟,傅强.卒中相关性肺炎病原菌分布、耐药情况及危险因素分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2020,26(02):138.
 GAO Wei,FU Qiang.Distribution, drug resistance and risk factors of pathogenic bacteria in patients with stroke-associated pneumonia[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2020,26(02):138.
[3]姜国晶,齐雪梅,王仲言,等.弗朗斯维尔市气象因素与疟疾、高血压和脑卒中关系的初步探讨[J].天津医科大学学报,2021,27(03):243.
 JIANG Guo-jing,QI Xue-mei,WANG Zhong-yan,et al.The associations between meteorological factors and malaria,hypertension and stroke in Franceville[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2021,27(02):243.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
基金项目:天津市深化医药卫生体制改革研究项目立项课题(2022-YG06)
作者简介:陈雁南(1993-),女,主管护师,硕士在读,研究方向:慢性病护理与心理护理;通信作者:庄淑梅,E-mail:snshumei@126.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-20