«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:

26卷

期数:

2020年05期

页码:

482-486

栏目:

技术与方法

出版日期:

2020-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Analysis and comparison of chronic spinal cord injury in rat model with metal screw and polyurethane rubber

文章编号:

1006-8147(2020)05-0482-05

作者:

杨世昌;  杨理;  张亮; 李文辉; 杨亚林; 孙伟粽; 王云国; 王凯

（天津医科大学第二医院骨科, 天津 300211）

Author(s):

YANG Shi-chang;  YANG Li;  ZHANG Liang;  LI Wen-hui;  YANG Ya-lin;  SUN Wei-zong;  WANG Yun-guo;  WANK Kai

（Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211，China）

关键词:

金属螺钉; 聚氨酯橡胶; 慢性脊髓损伤; 大鼠模型

Keywords:

metal screws;  polyurethane rubber;  chronic spinal cord injury;  rat model

分类号:

R744.2

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：比较金属螺钉与聚氨酯橡胶压迫的慢性脊髓损伤（CSCI）大鼠模型的优劣，探索适合CSCI研究的大鼠模型。方法： 108只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠完全随机分组为假手术组（n=36）、金 属螺钉组（n=36）和聚氨酯橡胶组（n=36），记录造模术前及术后2.5 h、7 d、14 d、21 d、28 d各组下肢行为学运动功能评分（BBB评分）和体感诱发电位（SEP），取C5段脊髓组织行苏木精-伊红染色 法（HE）和原位末端标记法（TUNEL）染色。结果：BBB评分：金属螺钉组与聚氨酯橡胶组较假手术组均明显降低（金属螺钉组比假手术组，t=9.671，P<0.000 1；聚氨酯橡胶组比假手术组，t=4.997， P=0.002 5），且金属螺钉组评分低于聚氨酯橡胶组（t=2.705，P=0.035 3），金属螺钉组持续下降，聚氨酯橡胶组则于术后21 d降至最低后开始上升。SEP：金属螺钉组与聚氨酯橡胶组较假手术组均出 现潜伏期延长（金属螺钉组比假手术组，t=18.02，P<0.000 1；聚氨酯橡胶组比假手术组，t=10.82，P<0.000 1）和波幅下降（金属螺钉组比假手术组，t=145.5，P<0.0001；聚氨酯橡胶组比假手术组， t=3.97，P= 0.007 4），且金属螺钉组潜伏期延长时间长于聚氨酯橡胶组，金属螺钉组波幅降低幅度先大于聚氨酯橡胶组，后较之略低。HE染色：金属螺钉组与聚氨酯橡胶组均出现脊髓损伤的病理表现 ，且金属螺钉组从腹侧到背侧渐进性加重，聚氨酯橡胶组则表现为一致性。TUNEL染色：金属螺钉组与聚氨酯橡胶组较假手术组TUNEL阳性细胞数明显增多（金属螺钉组比假手术组，t=4.722，P=0.003 2 ；聚氨酯橡胶组比假手术组，t=8.263，P=0.000 2），且主要集中于脊髓灰质前角。金属螺钉组在术后第7天阳性细胞数达到最高，之后明显减少，聚氨酯橡胶组在术后逐渐增加至术后21 d达到最高。结 论：两种模型均有效地模拟了CSCI，金属螺钉CSCI模型适合损伤程度逐渐加重的CSCI研究，聚氨酯橡胶CSCI模型则适合压迫程度稳定的CSCI研究。

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the rat model suitable for chronic spinal cord injury(CSCI), and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of CSCI rat model with metal screw and polyurethane rubber compression. Methods: A total of 108 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into sham operation group, metal screw group and polyurethane rubber group. The lower limb motor function scores(BBB scores) and the somatosensory evoked potency (SEP) were recorded at before and 2.5 hours,7 days, 14 days, 21 days and 28 days after the operation. The HE staining and the TUNEL were used for C5 spinal cord. Results: BBB scores showed that compared with sham operation group, metal screw group and polyurethane rubber group were significantly lower(metal screw group vs. sham operation group t=9.671，P<0.000 1; polyurethane rubber group vs. sham operation group t=4.997， P=0.002 5), and the metal screw group score was lower than the polyurethane rubber group(t=2.705，P=0.035 3). BBB score in the metal screw group continued to decrease, while the polyurethane rubber group score firstly decreased to the lowest 21 days after operation and then it began to rise. SEP indicated that compared with sham operation group, metal screw group and polyurethane rubber group showed prolonged latency(metal screw group vs. sham operation group t=18.02，P<0.000 1; polyurethane rubber group vs. sham operation group t=10.82，P<0.000 1) and decreased amplitude(metal screw group vs. sham operation group t=145.5，P<0.000 1; polyurethane rubber group vs. sham operation group t=3.97， P=0.007 4), and the latency period of the metal screw group was longer than that of polyurethane rubber group. The degree of amplitude reduction of the metal screw group was greater than that of polyurethane rubber group. HE staining showed that the pathological appearance of spinal cord injury was observed in metal screw group and polyurethane rubber group, and the metal screw group gradually increased from the ventral to the dorsal side, while the polyurethane rubber group showed consistency. TUNEL staining indicated that the number of TUNEL positive cells in metal screw group and polyurethane rubber group was significantly greater than that in the sham operated group(metal screw group vs. sham operation group t=4.722，P=0.003 2; polyurethane rubber group vs. sham operation group t=8.263，P=0.000 2), and was mainly concentrated in the anterior horn of gray matter. The number of TUNEL positive cells in the metal screw group reached the highest at 7 days after operation, and then decreased significantly, while the polyurethane rubber group reached the highest at 21 days after operation. Conclusion: Both models are effective in simulating CSCI. Furthermore, the CSCI model of metal screw is suitable for the CSCI research with gradually increasing degree of compression, while the CSCI model of polyurethane rubber is suitable for CSCI research with stable degree of compression.

参考文献/References:

[1] Hutson T H, Di Giovanni S. The translational landscape in spinal cord injury: focus on neuroplasticity and regeneration[J]. Nat Rev Neurol, 2019, 15(12): 732
[2] Pruss H, Tedeschi A, Thiriot A, et al. Spinal cord injury-induced immunodeficiency is mediated by a sympathetic-neuroendocrine adrenal reflex[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2017, 20(11): 1549
[3] Torres-Espin A, Forero J, Fenrich K K, et al. Eliciting inflammation enables successful rehabilitative training in chronic spinal cord injury[J]. Brain, 2018, 141(7): 1946
[4] Wang X J, Peng C H, Zhang S, et al. Polysialic-acid-based micelles promote neural regeneration in spinal cord injury therapy[J]. Nano Lett, 2019, 19(2): 829
[5] O'Shea T M, Burda J E, Sofroniew M V. Cell biology of spinal cord injury and repair[J]. J Clin Invest, 2017, 127(9): 3259
[6] Dias D O, Kim H, Holl D, et al. Reducing pericyte-derived scarring promotes recovery after spinal cord injury[J]. Cell, 2018, 173(1):153
[7] Wu M J, Vinit S, Chen C L, et al. 5-HT7 receptor inhibition transiently improves respiratory function following daily acute intermittent hypercapnic-hypoxia in rats with chronic midcervical spinal cord contusion[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2020, 34(4): 333
[8] Burnside E R, De Winter F, Didangelos A, et al. Immune-evasive gene switch enables regulated delivery of chondroitinase after spinal cord injury[J]. Brain, 2018, 141(8): 2362
[9] Hollis E R, 2nd, Ishiko N, Yu T, et al. Ryk controls remapping of motor cortex during functional recovery after spinal cord injury[J]. Nat Neurosci, 2016, 19(5): 697
[10] 谭波涛, 刘捷, 虞乐华, 等. 成年小鼠颈5脊髓钳夹损伤模型的制备与评价[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2019, 29(2): 164
[11] 黄志平, 林俊育, 刘俊豪, 等. 小鼠颈脊髓半侧挫伤模型的建立及其组织学特点[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(1): 40
[12] Basso D M, Beattie M S, Bresnahan J C. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats[J]. J Neurotrauma, 1995, 12(1): 1
[13] 李敏, 杨孝, 向武, 等. 大鼠脊髓损伤动物模型建立的研究进展[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2018, 18(72): 111
[14] 李晓彬, 刘涛, 周俊锋, 等. 实验性大鼠脊髓损伤模型的制备及研究进展[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2016, 19(23): 78

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

基金项目 国家自然科学基金资助项目（81702110）
作者简介 杨世昌（1995-），男，硕士在读，研究方向：脊髓损伤及其修复；
通信作者：王凯，E-mail: wangkaiy48@126.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-18