«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:

24卷

期数:

2018年04期

页码:

328-332

栏目:

出版日期:

2018-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Comparison of effect between open surgical and endovascular repair on ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

作者:

孙 昊; 戴向晨; 罗宇东; 范海伦; 冯 舟; 朱杰昌; 张益伟

天津医科大学总医院普通外科，天津 300052

Author(s):

SUN Hao;  DAI Xiang-chen;  LUO Yu-dong;  FAN Hai-lun;  FENG Zhou;  ZHU Jie-chang;  ZHANG Yi-wei

Department of General Surgery, General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University，Tianjin 300052, China

关键词:

破裂腹主动脉瘤; 开放手术; 腔内治疗

Keywords:

ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm;  open surgical repair;  endovascular repair

分类号:

R654.3

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

Ａ

摘要:

目的：比较破裂腹主动脉瘤（rAAA）开放手术（OR）与腔内治疗（EVAR）的治疗效果。方法：回顾性分析确诊rAAA并采取OR或EVAR治疗患者的临床资料。比较两组患者及其中游离破裂患者术前指标及合并症、术中指标、围术期死亡率、术后并发症、术后住院天数及生存率等。结果：共61例rAAA 患者，男性50例，女性11例，年龄37～86岁，平均（69.74±9.22）岁。OR组36例，EVAR组25例。两组在年龄、性别、合并症及血肌酐方面无显著性差异（P＞0.05），而在术前血流动力学稳定性方面存在显著性差异（P <0.05）。OR组与EVAR组围术期死亡率，术后30 d、6个月及12个月生存率均无显著性差异（P＞0.05）；OR组与EVAR组在术中出血量[（2116.67±1655.52）、（339.58±786.29） mL]，术中输血量[ (1413.33±978.29) 、（416.67±562.35） mL]，手术时长[（279.33±66.87） min 、（161.46±82.81) min]及ICU天数[5.0（IQR:2.0～6.0），1.0（IQR:0.0～2.0）] 方面存在显著性差异（P <0.001）。其中两组间游离破裂患者各指标均无显著性差异（P >0.05）。结论：EVAR在解剖结构合适、指征明确的患者中的应用，可显著改善预后并具有微创优势，同时在血流动力学不稳定患者中疗效不亚于OR，故EVAR可作为rAAA治疗的一线手段；而OR在解剖结构不适用于EVAR等病例中仍发挥着不可替代的作用。

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of open surgical repair (OR) and endovascular repair (EVAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA). Methods: Clinical data of patients diagnosed with rAAA and treated with OR or EVAR were analyzed retrospectively. Outcome parameters included preoperative characteristics and commodities, intraoperative indicators, perioperative mortality, complications, survival, and length of hospital stay of two groups and those of free-ruptured aneurysm. Results: Sixty-one consecutive cases (50 males; mean age, 69.74±9.22, range, 37～86 years) with rAAA treated with OR (n=36), or EVAR (n=25) approaches were presented. While baseline characteristics of age, gender, comorbidities, and preoperative serum creatinine level were similarly distributed (P>0.05), hemodynamic stabilities between two groups, however, were significantly different（P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality as well as survivals at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months between two groups （P>0.05）. And operative blood losses were significantly different（2 116.67 mL±1 655.52 mL and 339.58 mL±786.29 mL）, so were operative transfusion (1413.33 mL±978.29 mL and 416.67 mL±562.35 mL), duration (279.33 min±66.87 min and 161.46 min±82.81min), and median length of ICU stay[5.0（IQR 2.0～6.0） and 1.0 (IQR 0.0～2.0) days], respectively（P<0.001）. And no significant difference in parameters between two groups of free ruptured patients was found （P>0.05）. Conclusion: For rAAA patients with proper anatomy and specific indications, EVAR could be the first-line treatment which can improve prognosis and has the advantage of microinvasiveness. Meanwhile, its efficacy is no less than OR for patients with unstable hemodynamics. However, OR is still irreplaceable for patients with complicated anatomy.

参考文献/References:

[1] Matalliotakis M，Goulielmos G N，Kalogiannidis I，et al. Extra pelvic endometriosis: Retrospective analysis on 200 cases in two different countries[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol，2017，217: 34
[2] Chang C Y，Lai M T，Chen Y，et al. Up-regulation of ribosome biogenesis by MIR196A2 genetic variation promotes endometriosis development and progression[J]. Oncotarget，2016，7(47): 76713
[3] Ecker A M，Donnellan N M，Shepherd J P. Abdominal wall endometriosis: 12 years of experience at a large academic institution[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol，2014，211(4): 363
[4] Gachabayov M，Horta R，Afanasyev D. et al abdominal wall endometrioma:our experience in vladimir,Russia[J]. Niger Med J，2016，57(6): 329
[5] Wang P H，Juang C M，Chao H T，et al. Wound endometriosis: risk factor evaluation and treatment[J]. J Chin Med Assoc，2003，66(2): 113
[6] 吴珍珍，郭钰珍.腹壁子宫内膜异位症疾病特征Meta分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2014，30(10):802
[7] Da Y L，Trigo L，Benetti-Pinto C L，et al. Evaluation of cases of abdominal wall endometriosis at universidadeestadual de campinas in a period of 10 years[J]. Rev Bras GinecolObstet，2017，39(8): 403
[8] Vuksic T，Rastovic P，Dragisic V，et al.Abdominal Wall Endometrioma after Laparoscopic Operation of Uterine Endometriosis[J]. Case Rep Surg，2016，2016: 579
[9] Touleimat S，Darwish B，Vassilieff M，et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis following cesarean section:a study of the growth rate of parietal endometriosis implants[J]. Minerva Ginecol，2017，69(5): 440
[10] Pas K，Joanna S M，Renata R，et al. Prospective study concerning 71 cases of caesarean scar endometriosis(CSE)[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore)，2017，37(6): 775
[11] Savelli L，Manuzzi L，Di Donato N，et al. CeccaroniM，etal.endometriosis of the abdominal wall:ultrasonographic and doppler characteristics[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol，2012，39(3): 336
[12] Francica G. Reliable clinical and sonographic findings in the diagnosis of abdominal wall endometriosis near cesarean section scar[J]. World J Radiol，2012，4（4）: 135
[13] Yarmish G，Sala E，Goldman D A，et al. Abdominal wall endometriosis: differentiation from other masses using CT features[J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY，2017，42（5）: 1517
[14] Busard M H，Mijatovic V，Kuijk C，et al. Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on Mrimaging[J]. Eur Radiol，2010，20（5）: 1267
[15] Kobayashi H，Miyake W，Yamashita M，et al. The mechanism of the increase in the serum CA125 concentration in patients with endometriosis[J]. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi，1988，40（4）: 467
[16] Karimi-Zarchi M，Dehshiri-Zadeh N，Sekhavat L，et al. Correlation of CA-125 serum level and clinico-pathological characteristic of patients with endometriosis[J]. Int J Reprod Biomed（Yazd），2016， 14（11）: 713
[17] Zhu X，Chen L，Deng X，et al. A comparison between high-intensity focused ultrasound and surgical treatment for the management of abdominal wall endometriosis[J]. BJOG，2017，124（3，SI）: 53
[18] Maillot J，Brun J L，Dubuisson V，et al. Mid-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal wall endometriosis: comparison with surgery alone in a single institution[J]. Eur Radiol，2017，27（10）: 4298
[19] Siddiqui Z A，Husain F，Siddiqui Z，et al. Port site endometrioma: a rare cause of abdominal wall pain following laparoscopic surgery[J]. BMJ Case Rep，2017: 2017
[20] Sosa-Duran E E，Aboharp-Hasan Z，Mendoza-Morales R C，et al. Clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from abdominal wall endometriosis[J]. Cir Cir，2016，84（3）: 245
[21] FargasFabregas F，Cusido M. Malignant transformation of abdominal wall endometriosis with lymph node metastasis: Case report and review of literature[J]. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep，2014，8: 10
[22] Graur F，Mois E，Elisei R，et al. Malignant endometriosis of the abdominal wall[J]. Ann Ital Chir，2017，6（1）: 180

相似文献/References:

[1]杨芳 综述,詹江华 审校.胆道闭锁肝门肠吻合术式研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2020,26(06):587.
[2]韩万里,戴向晨,罗宇东,等.破裂腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗与手术治疗效果比较[J].天津医科大学学报,2015,21(04):304.
　HAN Wan-li,DAI Xiang-chen,LUO Yu-dong,et al.Comparing the effects of endovascular and open surgery repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2015,21(04):304.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

-

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-20