|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王景慧,高祥璐,杨丽霞,等.主导眼评估及主导眼与非主导眼调节功能的比较[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(03):266-269.
　WANG Jing-hui,GAO Xiang-lu,YANG Li-Xia,et al.Assessment of dominant eye and accommodation comparison between dominant and non-dominant eye[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(03):266-269.
点击复制

主导眼评估及主导眼与非主导眼调节功能的比较(PDF)
分享到：

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
23卷
期数:
2017年03期
页码:
266-269
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2017-05-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
Assessment of dominant eye and accommodation comparison between dominant and non-dominant eye
文章编号:
1006-8147(2017)03-0266-04
作者:
王景慧1; 高祥璐1; 杨丽霞2; 邢秀丽1; 崔鹏云1; 曹瀚坤1
(1.天津医科大学眼视光学院,天津300070;2.石家庄医学高等专科学校,石家庄050599)
Author(s):
WANG Jing-hui1;  GAO Xiang-lu1;  YANG Li-Xia2;  XING Xiu-li1;  CUI Peng-yun1;  CAO Han-kun1
( 1.School of Optometry and Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China; 2.Shijiazhuang Medical College,Shijiazhuang 050000,China)
关键词:
主导眼; 调节幅度; 调节滞后; 调节灵敏度
Keywords:
dominant eye;  accommodative amplitude;  accommodative lag;  accommodative facility
分类号:
R77
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：分别测量注视性、运动性和知觉性主导眼，分析不同测量方法结果的一致性；测量主导眼与非主导眼调节功能，分析主导眼与非主导眼调节功能的差异。方法：对80位近视眼志愿者，完全矫正后分别利用卡洞法测量注视性主导眼、用集合近点法测量运动性主导眼、附加镜片法测量知觉性主导眼。测量单眼调节幅度、调节滞后量及调节灵敏度。结果：注视性与运动性、注视性与知觉性运动性与知觉性主导眼结果一致性分别为k=0.48，k=0.32，k=0.37；双眼屈光差异越大，注视性与运动性主导眼测量结果一致性越低（r=0.732，P<0.05）。运动性主导眼与非主导眼的调节滞后量具有显著差异（ P<0.01），调节灵敏度差异具有统计学意义（P <0.05）。结论： \临床工作中应全面评估主导眼；运动性主导眼具有更小的调节滞后量和更差的调节灵敏度。
Abstract:
Objective: To measure the dominant eye using three different methods and analyze the consistency among them. To compare the accommodative amplitude(AA), accommodative facility (AF), and accommodative lag（AL） between dominant and non-dominant eyes. Methods: Eighty volunteers were enrolled in this study. Hole-in-the-card test, convergence near-point test add lens test were used to determine dominant eye with corrected vision. The AA, AF, AL were measured in the dominant and non-dominant eyes, respectively . Results: Sighting dominant eye and motor dominant eye, sighting dominant eye and sensory dominant eye, motor dominant eye and sensory dominant eye had moderate consistency( k=0.48，k=0.32，k=0.37).The higher the anisometropia ，the poorer consistency between sighting dominant eye and motor dominant eye（r=0.732，P <0.05）. There was a significant difference in accommodative lag between motor dominant and non-dominant eye（P <0.01） and there was also a significant difference in accommodative lag between motor dominant and non-dominant eye （P <0.05）. Conclusion: It should be comprehensively evaluated: the dominant eye may have less accommodative lag and worse accommodative facility than the non-dominant eye.

参考文献/References:

[1] Pointer J S. Sighting dominance，handedness，and visual acuity preference：three mutually exclusive modalities[J]．Ophthalmic Physiol 0pt，2001，21(2)：117
[2] Kommerell G, Schmitt C, Kromeier M, et al. Ocular prevalence versus ocular dominance[J]. Vision Res, 2003, 43(12):1397
[3] 赫雨时.斜视[M]．天津：天津科学技术出版社，1982：33
[4] 于璐，赵堪兴.视觉发育中眼优势柱及其可塑性的研究[J].国际眼科纵览，2007,31（6）：403
[5] Sengpiel F，Kind P C. The role of activity in development of the visual
system [J]．Curr Bio，2002，12(23)：818
[6] Crowley J C，Katz L C. Ocular dominance development revisited[J]．Cur Opin In Neurobiol,2002，12(1)：104
[7] Khan A Z，Crawford J D. Ocular dominance reverses as a function of horizontal gaze angle[J]．Vision Res，2001，41(14)：1743
[8] 金涵，王文娟，田军，等．主导眼测试其优势对近视发展影响研究[J]．中国实用眼科杂志，2013，31(11)：1410
[9] Lopes-Ferreira D，Neves H，Queiros A，et a1．Ocular dominance and visual function testing[J]．Biomed Res Int，2013，2013：238943
[10] Momeni-Moghaddam H, McAlinden C, Azimi A, et al. Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye[J].Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2014,252(3):509
[11] 胡培克，李兆春，杨亚波，等.成年近视患者主视眼与调节因素间关系的研究[J].中华实验眼科杂志，2012,30（11）：1026
[12] Landis J R, Koch G G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data[J].Biometrics,1977,33(1):159
[13] 蒋峰，黄一飞，张斌.优势眼分型及临床研究进展[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志，2015，17（6）：381
[14] Jiang F, Chen Z, Bi H, et al. Association between ocular sensory dominance and refractive error asymmetry[J]. PLoS One，2015 10(8):e0136222
[15] Pointer J S. Sighting dominance,habdedbess,and visual acuity preference:three mutually exclusive modalities[J].Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2OO1,21（2）:117
[16] 韩在柱，陆舜华. 兴安盟 3 个民族 7 种不对称行为特征的研究 [J] . 人类学学报,2OO1,2O（2）:137
[17] 邸悦，周晓东．白内障手术前后视物清晰程度对主导眼影响的临床观察[J]．中国实用眼科杂志，201l，29(6)：599
[18] 邸悦，周晓东．视角偏斜对主导眼及近视程度影响的研究[J]．中国临床医学，2011，18(4)：433
[19] 邸悦，周晓东．水平注视角度对主导眼的影响[J]．中国临床医学，2012，19(2)：134
[20] Ooi T L，Optom B，He Z J．Sensory eye dominance[J]．Optometry，2001，72(3)：168
[21] Barbeito R．Sighting dominance：an explanation based on the processing of visual direstion in tests of sighting dominance[J]．Vision Res，1981，21(6)：855
[22] Evans B J．Dyslexia and vision[M]．London and Philadelphia:Whurr Publishers，2001：53
[23] Adamek B, Karczewicz D. The dependence of the range of fusion on some selected functions of the visual system. Part II: Accommodation and dominance[J]. Klin Oczna,2006,108(4–6):167

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者简介 王景慧(1988-)，女，硕士在读，研究方向：眼视光学；

通信作者：高祥璐，E-mail：gaoxianglu8@126.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-18