«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:

28卷

期数:

2022年04期

页码:

428-432

栏目:

临床医学

出版日期:

2022-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Diagnostic value of plasma mNGS in patients with hematological malignancies complicated by infection

文章编号:

1006-8147（2022）04-0428-05

作者:

王晓芳¹; 2; 冯靖¹

（1.天津医科大学总医院呼吸内科，天津 300052；2.天津市职业病防治院综合内科，天津 300011）

Author(s):

WANG Xiao-fang¹; 2; FENG Jing¹

（1.Department of Respiratory Medicine，General Hospital，Tianjin Medical University，Tianjin 300052，China；2.Department of General Internal Medicine，Tianjin Occupational Disease Prevention and Control Institute，Tianjin 300011，China）

关键词:

mNGS; 感染; 恶性血液病

Keywords:

mNGS;  infection;  hematological malignancy

分类号:

R563.9

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：探讨宏基因组二代测序（mNGS）在恶性血液病并发感染患者中的诊断价值。方法：回顾分析2019年1月—2020年12月就诊于天津市第一中心医院血液科恶性血液病患者190例，对血浆mNGS检测到的致病菌种类、阳性率、检测时间及其与传统检测方法的结果进行分析。应用 SPSS22.0 统计学软件进行数据分析，通过Pearson χ2 检验或McNemar检验对离散变量进行比较分析。结果：血浆mNGS阳性率为77.37%，显著高于血培养（ χ2=13.36，P＜0.01）。细菌是mNGS检出率最高的病原体（43%），最常见的依次为葡萄球菌属、不动杆菌属和肠球菌属。mNGS所需要的时间少于血培养（t =22.37，P＜0.05）。此外，mNGS的敏感性较血培养高（80.25% vs. 8.02%， χ2=10.83，P＜0.01），但特异性低（47.06% vs. 100%， χ2=8.21，P＜0.01）。根据mNGS结果，75例（46.30%）患者调整抗感染治疗方案后，评价有效率为49.30%。结论：血浆mNGS联合传统的检测方法，能够快速且有效地提高对恶性血液病并发感染患者的病原学诊断能力，因而优化抗感染治疗。

Abstract:

Objective： To explore the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing（mNGS）in patients with hematological malignancies complicated by infection. Methods：From January 2019 to December 2020，a total of 190 patients with hematological malignancies who were treated in the Department of Hematology，Tianjin First Central Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The types of pathogenic bacteria detected by plasma mNGS，positive rate，detection time and the results compared with traditional detection methods were analyzed. SPSS22.0 statistical software was used for data analysis，and discrete variables were compared by Pearson χ2 test or McNemar test. Results：The positive rate of mNGS in plasma was 77.37%，which was significantly higher than that in blood culture（χ2=13.36，P＜0.01）. Bacteria were the pathogens with the highest detection rate in mNGS（43%），and the most common were Staphylococcus，Acinetobacter，and Enterococcus. The time required for mNGS was less than blood culture （t=22.37，P<0.05）. In addition，the sensitivity of mNGS was higher than that of blood culture（80.25% vs. 8.02%，χ2=10.83，P＜0.01），but the specificity was lower （47.06% vs. 100%，χ2=8.21，P＜0.01）. According to the mNGS results，after adjusting the anti-infective treatment regimen in 75 patients（46.30%），the effective rate was 49.3%. Conclusion：Plasma mNGS combined with traditional detection methods can rapidly and effectively improve the etiological diagnosis ability of patients with hematological malignancies complicated by infection，thus optimizing anti-infective treatment.

参考文献/References:

[1] FORBES J D，KNOX N C，JENNIFER R，et al. Metagenomics：the next culture-independent game changer[J].Front Microbiol，2017，8：1069.
[2] ROSSEN J W A，FRIEDRICH A W，MORAN-GILAD J，et al. Practical issues in implementing whole-genome-sequencing in routine diagnostic microbiology[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect，2018，24（40）：355-360.
[3] GU W，MILLER S，CHIU C Y. Clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection[J]. Ann Rev Pathol，2019，14（1）：319-338.
[4] WANG H，LU Z，BAO Y，et al. Clinical diagnostic application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in children with severe nonresponding pneumonia[J]. PLoS ONE，2020，15（6）：e0232610.
[5] LANGELIER C，ZINTER M S，KALANTAR K ，et al. Metagenomic sequencing detects respiratory pathogens in hematopoietic cellular transplant patients[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med，2018，197（4）：524-528.
[6] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 医院感染诊断标准（试行）[J]. 中华医学杂志，2001，81（5）：314-320.
[7] FREIFELD A G，BOW E J，SEPKOWITZ K A，et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer：2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america[J]. Clin Infects Dis，2011（4）：e56.
[8] SHEN H，SHEN D，SONG H ，et al. Clinical assessment of the utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pediatric patients of hematology department[J]. Int J Lab Hematol，2020，43（2）：244-249.
[9] PANDAY R N，WANG S，VAN D，et al. Evaluation of blood culture epidemiology and efficiency in a large European teaching hospital[J]. PLoS ONE，2019，14（3）：e0214052.
[10] JING C，CHEN H，LIANG Y，et al. Clinical evaluation of an improved metagenomic next-generation sequencing test for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections[J]. Clin Chem，2021，67（8）：1133-1143.
[11] SUN T，X WU，CAI Y，et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogenic diagnosis and antibiotic management of severe community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised adults[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol，2021，11：661589.
[12] QIAN Y Y，WANG H Y，ZHOU Y，et al. Improving pulmonary infection diagnosis with metagenomic next generation sequencing[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol，2021，10：567615.
[13] MIKULSKA M，VISCOLI C，ORASCH C ，et al. Aetiology and resistance in bacteraemias among adult and paediatric haematology and cancer patients[J]. J Infect，2014，68（4）：321-331.
[14] CHEN Y，FENG W，YE K，et al. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pulmonary infectious pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage samples[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol，2021，11：541092.
[15]冯翔. 高通量技术在重症肺炎患者呼吸道病原体快速检测中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床，2018，15（16）：3.2439-2440，2444.
[16] LIU N，KAN J，YU N，et al. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing technology for difficult lung lesions in patients with haematological diseases[J]. Transl Cancer Res，2020，9（9）：5245-5254.
[17] WANG Q，WU B，YANG D，et al. Optimal specimen type for accurate diagnosis of infectious peripheral pulmonary lesions by mNGS[J]. BMC Pulm Med，2020，20（1）：268.
[18] LIU N，KAN J，CAO W，et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary infectious lesions through virtual navigation，radial EBUS，ultrathin bronchoscopy，and ROSE[J]. J Inte Med Res，2019，47（10）：030006051986695.
[19] ZHANG Y，CUI P，ZHANG H C，et al. Clinical application and evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in suspected adult central nervous system infection[J]. J Transl Med，2020，18（1）：199.
[20] Wang Q，Miao Q，Pan J，et al. The clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the microbiological diagnosis of skin and soft tissue infections[J]. Int J Infect Dis，2020，100：414-420.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘伟伟,吴冬燕,许静,等.心脏起搏装置感染的处理与转归[J].天津医科大学学报,2013,19(05):403.
[2]陈雅婧,王 勇 综述,刘运德,等.C1QBP的多种配体及其在感染和炎症中的研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2016,22(01):84.
[3]崔蕾,李虹,孙雪丽,等.剖宫产抗生素使用时间对超重产妇感染的影响[J].天津医科大学学报,2021,27(06):614.
　CUI Lei,LI Hong,SUN Xue-li,et al.The influence of antibiotics usage timing in cesarean section on overweight pregnant women[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2021,27(04):614.
[4]杨钲,宋光彩,邢杰.成人感染犬复孔绦虫1例[J].天津医科大学学报,2023,29(05):557.
[5]崔晓慧,曹源,孟晓楠,等.系统性红斑狼疮合并感染的临床分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2024,30(03):260.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.03.0260]
　CUI Xiaohui,CAO Yuan,MENG Xiaonan,et al.Clinical analysis of systemic lupus erythematosus complicated with infection[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2024,30(04):260.[doi:10.20135/j.issn.1006-8147.2024.03.0260]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者简介:王晓芳（1982-），女，主治医师，硕士在读，研究方向：呼吸内科；通信作者：冯靖，E-mail：yuhan201314@163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-20