«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:

27卷

期数:

2021年06期

页码:

614-617

栏目:

临床医学

出版日期:

2021-11-15

文章信息/Info

Title:

The influence of antibiotics usage timing in cesarean section on overweight pregnant women

文章编号:

1006-8147（2021）06-0614-04

作者:

崔蕾; 李虹; 孙雪丽; 王新胜; 谢炎; 韩欣欣

（天津市第一中心医院产科，天津300192）

Author(s):

CUI Lei; LI Hong; SUN Xue-li; WANG Xin-sheng; XIE Yan; HAN Xin-xin

（Department of Obstetrics，Tianjin First Central Hospital，Tianjin 300192，China）

关键词:

超重孕妇; 抗生素; 剖宫产; 感染

Keywords:

overweight pregnant women;  antibiotics;  cesarean section;  infection

分类号:

R719.8

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：比较剖宫产术前半小时和术后断脐带后立即予静脉点滴抗生素对于超重产妇感染的影响。方法：选取2020年5月—2021年3月收治的行剖宫产的产妇775名作为研究对象。根据体重指数（BMI）将产妇分成超重组和正常体重组。根据抗生素使用时间的不同将产妇分成术前给药组和术后给药组。术前给药组剖宫产手术前30 min行头孢唑林钠静脉给药，剂量为1 g; 术后给药组断脐带后立即行头孢唑林钠静脉给药，剂量为1 g。记录各组产妇的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数，住院费用；观察各组产妇手术前后体温、白细胞（WBC）数目、中性粒细胞百分比（N%）、中性粒细胞（N）绝对数目、血红蛋白（HB）数目以及切口感染情况。结果：不同体重组产妇在手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院天数、住院费用、手术前后体温、术前WBC、术前N绝对数目、手术前后HB数目以及切口感染比率上差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。正常体重产妇术前给药组N绝对数目低于术后给药组，差异有统计学意义（t=4.24，P<0.05）；超重组术前给药产妇术后WBC和N绝对数目低于术后给药组，差异具有统计学意义（t=3.11、4.78,均P<0.05）。结论：超重产妇剖宫产手术前半个小时行头孢唑林钠给药较术后给药更有效预防创口感染。

Abstract:

Objective： To systematically compare the effects of intravenous antibiotics on the infection of overweight pregnant women half an hour before cesarean section and immediately after the umbilical cord disconnection. Methods: A total of 775 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section from May 2020 to March 2021 were selected as the research object. The pregnant women were divided into overweight group and normal weight group according to the maternal body mass index（BMI）.The pregnant women were divided into pre-operation group and post-operation group according to the different use time of antibiotics. In the preoperative group，cefazolin sodium was administered intravenously 30 minutes before cesarean section at a dose of 1 g. Cefazolin sodium was administered intravenously at a dose of 1g after the umbilical cord cut off in the postoperative group. The operation time，intraoperative bleeding，postoperative hospitalization days and hospitalization expenses were recorded after using different antibiotics. At the same time，the body temperature，white blood cells （WBC） count，neutrophil percentage（N%），neutrophil（N） absolute number，hemoglobin（HB） number and incision infection were observed before and after operation. Results: There was no significant difference for operation time，intraoperative blood loss，postoperative hospitalization days，hospitalization expenses，body temperature before and after the operation，WBC and N absolute number before the operation，HB number before and after operation and incision infection rate between two weight groups（all P>0.05）.N absolute number in the preoperative administration group of normal weight pregnant women was lower than that in the postoperative administration group，the difference was statistically significant（t=4.24，P<0.05）.WBC and N absolute number in the preoperative group of overweight pregnant women were lower than those of the postoperative group，the differences were statistically significant（t=3.11， 4.78，all P<0.05）. Conclusion: The administration of cefazolin half an hour before cesarean section is more effective than postoperative administration in preventing wound infection for overweight pregnant women.

参考文献/References:

[1] MYLES T D，GOOCH J，SANTOLAYA J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol，2002，100（5 Pt 1）：959
[2] TRAN T S，JAMULITRAT S，CHONGSUVIVATWONG V，et al. Risk factors for postcesarean surgical site infection[J]. Obstet Gynecol，2000，95（3）：367
[3] WEISS J L，MALONE F D，EMIG D，et al. Obesity，obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate--a population-based screening study[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol，2004，190（4）：1091
[4] MANDAL D，MANDA S，RAKSHI A，et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a prospective analysis[J]. J Assoc Physicians India，2011，59：486
[5] 刘妹莲，邱丽心，张世阳，等. 剖宫产围手术期预防使用抗菌药物分析[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志，2013，23（4）：907
[6] TITA ATN，OWEN J，STAMM A M，et al. Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a meta analysis[J]. Amer J Obst Gynecol，2008，199（3）：301
[7] CHELMOW D，RUEHLI M S，HUANG E. Prophylactic use of antibiotics for nonlaboring patients undergoing cesarean delivery with intact membranes：a meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol，2001， 184（4）：656
[8] 甘艳琼，陈朝霞，石琪，等. 二孩政策后剖宫产率及剖宫产指征的变化[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究，2020，178（2）：79
[9] 李东燕，袁丽萍，王华. 孕产妇分娩方式选择及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生，2014，30（6）：829
[10] WANG C，WEI Y，ZHANG X，et al. A randomized clinical trial of exercise during pregnancy to prevent gestational diabetes mellitus and improve pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese pregnant women[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol，2017，216（4）：340
[11] 孟雨. 孕妇体重超重与剖宫产率的关系[J]. 中外女性健康研究，2019，6（24）：68
[12] COCHRANE L，BRUMPTON K，WINTER S，et al. Prevalence and outcomes of overweight and obesity among pregnant women in rural Queensland[J]. Aust J Rural Health，2019，27（2）：164
[13] 胡小靖，漆洪波. ACOG“正常分娩抗生素预防性应用”指南（2018）解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志，2019，35（6）：666
[14] 王红莲. 关于剖宫产术预防性使用抗生素的合理性分析[J]. 中国药物经济学，2013，8（S2）：97
[15] ACOG PRACTICE BULLETIN N O. 199：Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol，2018，132（3）：e103
[16] 金仁淑，韩元一. 两组不同抗生素使用方式在剖宫产术中的应用效果观察[J]. 北方药学，2014，11（8）：71
[17] LI M，SHI B，MA J，et al. Comparing prophylactic use of cefazolin for SSI in cesarean section：a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet，2021，303（2）：313
[18] ANDERSON V，CHABOYER W，GILLESPIE B. The relationship between obesity and surgical site infections in women undergoing caesarean sections：an integrative review[J]. Midwifery，2013，29（12）：1331
[19] 张妍，张兰梅，周玲，等. 超重孕妇孕期体重增长与妊娠结局关系的探讨[J]. 中国实验诊断学，2018，22（2）：269
[20] ROBINSON H E，O′CONNELL C M，JOSEPH K S，et al. Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity[J]. Obstet Gynecol，2005，106（6）：1357
[21] Smaill F M，Grivell R M. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev，2014（10）：CD007482

相似文献/References:

[1]刘伟伟,吴冬燕,许静,等.心脏起搏装置感染的处理与转归[J].天津医科大学学报,2013,19(05):403.
[2]姚建文,吴 文,董 亮,等.单中心儿童腹腔感染产ESBLs大肠埃希菌的耐药性分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2018,24(04):325.
[3]史丽,郁春艳,李岩,等.脐带采集液中抗生素的合理选择[J].天津医科大学学报,2021,27(06):618.
　SHI Li,YU Chun-yan,LI Yan,et al.Added rational antibiotics in umbilical cord preservation fluid[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2021,27(06):618.
[4]李勃,庄冬生 综述,鲁鑫 审校.纳米材料在抗菌药物载体方面的研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2022,28(01):105.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

作者简介 中国博士后科学基金（2018M640243）；天津市自然科学基金（19JCQNJC10300） 作者简介 崔蕾(1991-)，女，医师，硕士，研究方向：妊娠合并内科疾病；通信作者：李虹，E-mail:a1234_1982@163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-15