«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:

26卷

期数:

2020年06期

页码:

563-568

栏目:

Meta分析

出版日期:

2020-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Conservative treatment versus early appendectomy for patients with periappendiceal abscess: a Meta- analysis

作者:

王鑫慧¹; 冯伟¹; 王月¹; 董亮²

1.天津医科大学研究生院，天津300070；2. 天津市儿童医院小儿外科，天津300134

Author(s):

WANG Xin-hui¹;  FENG Wei¹; WANG Yue¹;  DONG Liang²

1. Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China； 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tianjin Children′s Hospital, Tianjin 300134, China

关键词:

阑尾周围脓肿; 保守治疗; 早期阑尾切除术; 择期阑尾切除术; Meta分析

Keywords:

periappendiceal abscess;  conservative treatment;  early appendectomy;  interval appendectomy;  Meta-analysis

分类号:

R656

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的：通过 Meta分析评价保守治疗与早期阑尾切除术对阑尾周围脓肿的临床疗效及安全性。方法：根据 PRISMA，检索SinoMed、PubMed、Web of Science、MEDLine、Wiley Online、EMBASE和Cochrane 图书馆中2000-2019 年收录的保守治疗与早期阑尾切除术治疗阑尾周围脓肿的相关文献，评价两组并发症发生率、总住院时间等13个指标 。采用RevMan 5.3 软件进行Meta分析。结果：最终共纳入15篇相关文献，其中保守治疗（CT）组645例，早期阑尾切 除术（EA）组471例。Meta分析结果显示，两组的年龄、体重、白细胞、C反应蛋白、脓肿最大直径、再入院率和总住 院时间相比，差异无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）；支持保守治疗的结局指标是禁食时间（WMD=-1.21，95%CI：-1.85 ～-0.57，P=0.000 2）、并发症发生率（OR=0.08，95%CI：0.03～0.23，P＜0.000 01）、脓肿复发率（OR=0.16， 95%CI：0.07～0.35)，P＜0.000 01）。支持早期阑尾切除的结局指标是病程（WMD=-1.61，95%CI：0.66~2.56， P=0.000 9）和阑尾炎复发率（OR=23.47，95%CI：5.72～96.32，P＜0.000 1）。另外，择期手术比早期手术时间短（ WMD=-19.06，95%CI：-33.61～-4.52，P=0.01），术后并发症发生率低（OR=0.26，95%CI：0.07~0.94，P=0.04），两 者的住院时间没有差异（WMD=0.91，95%CI：-5.85～7.68，P=0.79）。结论：保守治疗阑尾周围脓肿能明显减少并发 症和脓肿复发的发生率，并且能明显缩短择期手术的手术时间和术后禁食时间，加速患者康复，具有一定的安全性和 有效性。

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conservative treatment (CT) versus early appendectomy (EA) for patients with periappendiceal abscess(PA) through meta-analysis. Methods：Adhered to the PRISMA guidelines, SinoMed, PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLine, Wiley Online Library, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from 2000 to 2019 comparing CT with EA for PA. Thirteen indicators, such as complication rate and total hospital stay were evaluated. Meta analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3. Results： Fifteen studies were selected for meta-analysis, including 645 cases in the conservative treatment (CT) group and 471 cases in the early appendectomy(EA) group. No significant difference was found in age, weight, WBC, CRP, maximum size of abscess, readmission and total hospital stay between the two groups(all P＞0.05). Outcomes favoring CT group were oral feeding time（WMD=-1.21, 95%CI:-1.85--0.57, P=0.000 2）,complication rate（OR =0.08, 95%CI:0.03-0.23, P<0.000 01）and abscess recurrence（OR=0.16, 95%CI: 0.07-0.35, P<0.000 01）. Outcomes favoring EA group were duration of symptoms（WMD=-1.61, 95%CI:0.66-2.56, P=0.000 9）and appendicitis recurrence（OR =23.47, 95%CI:5.72-96.32, P＜0.000 1）. Besides, the time of interval appendectomy is shorter than early appendectomy（WMD=-19.06, 95%CI：-33.61--4.52, P=0.01）， postoperative complications of interval appendectomy was lower（OR=0.26, 95%CI：0.07-0.94, P=0.04）, there was no difference in total hospital stay （WMD=0.91, 95%CI：-5.85-7.68, P=0.79）. Conclusion：Conservative treatment of periappendicular abscess can significantly reduce the incidence of complications and abscess recurrence, and can significantly shorten the operation time and postoperative feeding time of interval surgery, accelerate the recovery of patients, with a certain safety and effectiveness.

参考文献/References:

[1] Pradeep P N，Stylianos S，Velis E，et al. Treatment of suspected acute perforated appendicitis with antibiotics and interval appendectomy[J]. J Pediatr Surg，2014，49（3）：447
[2] Zerem E，Salkic N，Imamovic G，et al. Comparison of therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess： is appendectomy always necessary after perforation of appendix[J]. Surg Endosc，2007，21（3）：461
[3] Yao C，Xiong X Z，Lu J，et al. Early versus delayed appendicectomy for appendiceal phlegmon or abscess[J]. Cochr Datab Systematic Rev，2017，6（6）：CD011670
[4] Vaos G，Dimopoulou A，Gkioka E，et al. Immediate surgery or conservative treatment for complicated acute appendicitis in children A meta-analysis[J]. J Pediatr Surg，2019，54（7）：1365
[5] Fugazzola P，Federico C，Tomasoni M，et al. Early appendectomy vs. conservative management in complicated acute appendicitis in children：a Meta-analysis[J]. J Pediatr Surg，2019，54（11）：2234
[6] Simillis C，Symeonides P，Shorthouse A J，et al. A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis（abscess or phlegmon）[J]. Surgery，2010，147（6 ）：818
[7] Paschalis G，Nicola D，Katsanos K，et al. Acute appendicectomy or conservative treatment for complicated appendicitis（phlegmon or abscess） a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative Meta-Analysis[J]. J Clin Med Res，2019，11（1）：56
[8] Shawn D P，Aguayo P，Fraser J D，et al. Initial laparoscopic appendectomy versus initial nonoperative management and interval appendectomy for perforated appendicitis with abscess： a prospective，randomized trial[J]. J Pediatr Surg，2010，45（1）：236
[9] Brown C V，Abrishaml M，Muller M，et al. Appendiceal abscess：immediate operation or percutaneous drainage[J]. Am Surg，2003，69（10）：829
[10] Guida E，Pederiva F，Grazia M D，et al. Perforated appendix with abscess： Immediate or interval appendectomy? Some examples to explain our choice[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep，2015，12：15
[11] Erdo■an D，Karaman ■，Adnan N，et al. Comparison of two methods for the management of appendicular mass in children[J]. Pediatr Surg Int，2005,21（2）：81
[12] Furuya T，Inoue M，Sugito K，et al. Effectiveness of interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of pediatric ruptured appendicitis with abscess[J]. Indian J Surg，2015，77（S3）：1041
[13] Ho C M，Chen Y，Lai H S，et al. Comparison of critical conservative treatment versus emergency operation in children with ruptured appendicitis with tumor formation[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2004，103 （5）：359
[14] Deelder J D，Richir M C，Schoorl T，et al. How to treat an appendiceal inflammatory mass： operatively or nonoperatively[J]. J Gastrointest Surg，2014， 18（4）：641
[15] Aranda-Narváez J M，González-Sánchez A J，Marín-Camero N，et al. Conservative approach versus urgent appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon[J]. Rev Esp Enferm Dig，2010，102（11）：648
[16] Hsin-Yu T， Hsun-Chin C， Yu W J. Early appendectomy shortens antibiotic course and hospital stay in children with early perforated appendicitis[J]. Pediatr Neonatol，2017，58（5）：406
[17] Henry M C，Gollin G，Islam S，et al. Matched analysis of nonoperative management vs. immediate appendectomy for perforated appendicitis[J]. J Pediatr Surg，2007，42（1）：19
[18] David O，Dan Y，Vikram M U，et al. Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess[J]. Dis Colon Rectum，2001，44（7）：936
[19] Jonathan P R，Partrick D A，Jennifer L B，et al. Complicated appendicitis in children：a clear role for drainage and delayed appendectomy[J]. Am J Surg，2007，194（6）：769
[20] Samuel M，Hosie G，Holmes K. Prospective evaluation of nonsurgical versus surgical management of appendiceal mass[J]. J Pediatr Surg， 2002，37（6）：882
[21] Tanaka Y，Uchida H，Kawashima H，et al. More than one-third of successfully nonoperatively treated patients with complicated appendicitis experienced recurrent appendicitis：is interval appendectomy necessary[J]. J Pediatr Surg，2016，51（12）：1957
[22] Tingstedt B，Bexe-Lindskog E，Ekelund M，et al. Management of appendiceal masses[J]. Eur J Surg， 2002，168（11）：579
[23] Zhang Y C，Stringel G，Bezahler I，et al. Nonoperative management of periappendiceal abscess in children：a comparison of antibiotics alone versus antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage[J]. J Pediatr Surg，2020，55（3）：414
[24] Eileen M D， Marshall A P，Katrina L W，et al. A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials comparing early versus interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis[J]. Pediatr Surg Int，2016，32（7）：649
[25] Saar S，Mihnovit?觢 V，Lustenberger T，et al. Twenty-four hour versus extended antibiotic administration after surgery in complicated appendicitis：a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg，2019，86（1）：36
[26] Zhi X L，Bonney G K，Jimmy B Y，et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis： a meta-analysis[J]. Surg Endosc，2019，33（12）：4066
[27] Yang E，Nie D, Li Z Y, Comparison of major clinical outcomes between transvaginal NOTES and traditional laparoscopic surgery：a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Surg Res，2019，244：278

相似文献/References:

[1]张 艳,崔华雷.腹腔镜治疗小儿阑尾周围脓肿适应征的初步探讨[J].天津医科大学学报,2014,20(01):65.
[2]郭世伟 综述,邓靖宇 审校.胃癌根治术后乳糜漏的研究进展[J].天津医科大学学报,2020,26(05):497.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

文章编号 1006-8147（2020）06-0563-06
作者简介 王鑫慧（1933-），女，硕士在读，研究方向：小儿外科，通信作者：董亮，E-mail:dlzai@sina.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-20