|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]柳 杨,马会强,刘大勇,等.浸润性树脂与窝沟封闭剂治疗早期龋效果的比较[J].天津医科大学学报,2018,24(06):536-538544.
　LIU Yang,MA Hui-qiang,LIU Da-yong,et al.Comparison of the effect between infiltrating resin and pit and fissure sealant on treating early caries[J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2018,24(06):536-538544.
点击复制

浸润性树脂与窝沟封闭剂治疗早期龋效果的比较(PDF)
分享到：

《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]

卷:
24卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
536-538544
栏目:
临床医学
出版日期:
2018-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the effect between infiltrating resin and pit and fissure sealant on treating early caries
作者:
柳 杨; 马会强;  刘大勇;  赵梦明;  贾 智
（天津医科大学口腔医院牙体牙髓科，天津 300070）
Author(s):
LIU Yang;  MA Hui-qiang;  LIU Da-yong;  ZHAO Meng-ming;  JIA Zhi
（Department of Endodontics, Stomatological Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China）
关键词:
浸润性树脂 ; 窝沟封闭剂 ; 早期龋
Keywords:
infiltrant;  pit and fissure sealant ;  early caries
分类号:
R781.1
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的：比较浸润性树脂和窝沟封闭剂治疗早期龋的效果。方法: 处理后的前牙置于脱矿液中制备人工龋，之后将人工龋分为4个实验区域，分别应用涂布指甲油、不做任何处理、涂布浸润性树脂、涂布窝沟封闭剂等4种不同的处理方法。再次置于脱矿液中，21 d后，观察脱矿深度。结果: 浸润性树脂处理后的牙体第二次脱矿的深度为（4.531±2.163） μm，小于窝沟封闭剂处理过的牙体，其第二次脱矿的深度为（31.228±7.587） μm。结论: 浸润性树脂治疗早期龋的效果优于窝沟封闭剂。
Abstract:
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of infiltrant method and that of pit and fissure sealant in treating early caries. Methods: We placed the experimental teeth in demineralizing solution to create artificial caries, and we divided it into 4 sections. We applied different methods on these sections including coating nail polisher, infiltrating agents, pit and fissure sealants, and not performing any treatment on the last section in control group. After that, we placed the teeth in demineralizing solution for an extra 21 days. At last, we observed the depth of artificial caries. Results: sealing effects of infiltrating agent showed better outcome than pit and fissure sealant. And The depth of the second demineralization treated with infiltrating resin was（4.531±2.163）μm, which was lower than that of the teeth treated with pit and fissure sealant（31.228±7.587）μm. Conclusion: Infiltrant is better than the pit and fissure sealant for the treatment of early caries.

参考文献/References:


[1] Petersen P E. Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21 century The approach of the WHO global oral health program[R]. Geneva. World health organization, 2003
[2] Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Reiteration[J]. Int J Epidemiol，2001，30:427
[3] Beauchamp J，Caufield P W，Carall J，et al. Evidence –based clinical recommendations for the use of pit and fissure sealants[J]. J Am Dent Assoc，2008，139（3）: 257
[4] Corona S A M，Borsatto M C，Garica L，et al. Randomized，controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up[J]. Int J Pediatr Dent，2010，15（1）: 44
[5] 谢富强. Dyract flow流动复合体和光固化窝沟封闭剂3年效果评价[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志，2003，19（1）: 69
[6] Gray G B，Shellis P. Infiltration of resin into white spot caries-like lesions of enamel: an in vitro study[J]. European Euro J Prostbodont Rest Dent，2002，10: 27
[7] Kumaran P. Clinical evaluation of the retention of different pit and fissure sealants: a 1-year study[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent，2013， 6（3）: 183
[8] Hebling J，Feigal R J. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel[J]. Am J Dent，2000，13（4）: 187
[9] 徐美玉. Dyract flow流动复合体与光固化窝沟封闭剂治疗磨牙窝沟龋的临床比较[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志，2006，22（4）: 562
[10] Paris S，Meyerlueckel H. Inhibition of caries progression by resin infiltration in situ [J]. Caries Res，2010，44（1）: 47

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介 柳杨（1982-）,男，硕士在读，研究方向：牙体牙髓；通信作者： 贾智，E-mail:jiazhi1962@tmu.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-30