[1]解 斌,路 超,盛 镔,等.S.T.O.N.E.评分与Guy’s评分预测经皮肾镜取石术结石清除率对比分析[J].天津医科大学学报,2017,23(02):115-117.
XIE Bin,LU Chao,SHENG Bin,et al.Comparative analysis of S.T.O.N.E. and Guy stone score in predicting stone clearance rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].Journal of Tianjin Medical University,2017,23(02):115-117.
点击复制
S.T.O.N.E.评分与Guy’s评分预测经皮肾镜取石术结石清除率对比分析(PDF)
《天津医科大学学报》[ISSN:1006-8147/CN:12-1259/R]
- 卷:
-
23卷
- 期数:
-
2017年02期
- 页码:
-
115-117
- 栏目:
-
专题报道
- 出版日期:
-
2017-03-20
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Comparative analysis of S.T.O.N.E. and Guy stone score in predicting stone clearance rate of percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- 文章编号:
-
1006-8147(2017)02-0115-03
- 作者:
-
解 斌 ; 路 超 ; 盛 镔 ; 齐士勇 ; 张志宏 ; 徐 勇
-
?(天津医科大学第二医院泌尿外科,天津市泌尿外科研究所,天津 300211)
- Author(s):
-
XIE Bin
; LU Chao; SHENG Bin; QI Shi-yong; ZHANG Zhi-hong; XU Yong
-
(Department of Urology,The Second Hospital, Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin Institute of Urology,Tianjin 300211,China)
-
- 关键词:
-
S.T.O.N.E.评分系统; Guy’s评分系统; 肾结石; 结石清除率
- Keywords:
-
S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry
; Guy stone score ; renal stone; stone clearance rate
- 分类号:
-
R691.4
- DOI:
-
-
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
目的: 对比和评价S.T.O.N.E.评分系统和Guy’s评分系统预测经皮肾镜取石术患者术后结石清除率。方法: 回顾性分析362例接受PCNL患者的临床资料。对同一患者的临床资料分别计算S.T.O.N.E.评分和Guy’s评分。结果: 一期结石清除率为72%,58(17%)位患者发生术后并发症。结石清除组与结石残留组的Guy’s评分平均分别为2.3分和2.9分 (P<0.001),S.T.O.N.E.评分平均分别为8.2分和9.8分(p <0.001)。S.T.O.N.E.评分系统和Guy’s评分系统都能预测结石清除率,但S.T.O.N.E.评分系统(SROC=0.710)优于Guy’s评分系统(SROC=0.674)。结论: S.T.O.N.E.评分系统和Guy’s评分系统相比能够好的预测PCNL患者的结石清除率。
- Abstract:
-
Objective :To compare and evaluate predictive ability of the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry and the Guy stone score(GSS) for percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL).Methods:A total of 362 patients who suffered PCNL were retrospectively analyzed.The S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry and GSS were calculated by a single observer based on preoperative clinical information. Results: The stone-free rate(SFR) after the first procedure was 72%. There were 58 complications (17%). In stone-free group and non stone-free group, the mean Guy score was 2.3 vs 2.9 (P <0.001) and the mean S.T.O.N.E. score was 8.2 vs 9.8 (P <0.001). The S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry and the GSS were significantly correlated with the postoperative stone-free status (P <0.001,each). However, the S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry (SROC=0.710) showed more accurate prediction for SFS than the GSS (SROC=0.674). Conclusion: Compared (加上with) GSS, the S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry scores could predict SFS more accurately after PCNL?
参考文献/References:
[1] Geavlete P. Editorial comment on: Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy in the 21st century[J]. Eur Urol, 2007,52(2):352
[2] Preminger G M, Assimos D G, Lingeman J E, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations[J]. J Urol, 2005,173(6):1991
[3] de la Rosette J J, Opondo D, Daels F P, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Eur Urol,2012,62(2):246
[4] Hassan M, El-Nahas A R, Sheir K Z, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20-30 mm single renal pelvic stone[J]. Arab J Urol, 2015,13(3):212
[5] 沈伟华,徐庆康,于永涛,等. 标准通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾和输尿管上段结石[J]. 中国微创外科杂志,2012,12(5):414
[6] Mishra S, Sabnis R B, Desai M. Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy[J]. J Endourol, 2012,6(1):6
[7] Zhu Z, Wang S, Xi Q, et al. Stic regression model for predicting stone-free rate after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Urology, 2011,8(1):32
[8] Sfoungaristos S, Gofrit O N, Yutkin V, et al. Renal validation of CROES nephrolithometry as a preoperative predictive system for percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes[J]. J Urology, 2016,95(2):372
[9] Thomas K, Smith N C, Hegarty N, et al. Guy’s stone score—grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures[J]. Urology, 2011,8(2):277
[10] Vicentini F C, Marchini G S, Mazzucchi E, et al. Utility of the Guy’s stone score based on computed tomographic scan findings for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes[J]. Urology, 2014,3(6):1248
[11] Okhunov Z, Friedlander J I, George A K, et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi[J]. Urology, 2013,1(6):1154
相似文献/References:
更新日期/Last Update:
2017-03-28